Florida Gulf Coast
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,330  Lauren Tarovisky JR 21:53
1,361  Brooke Sill JR 21:56
1,786  Courtney Corradetti JR 22:21
1,933  Regan Farrow SO 22:30
2,059  Alicen Wilbur SO 22:38
2,139  Stephanie Cajas SO 22:42
2,153  Anita Munoz FR 22:43
3,347  Amanda Restivo SO 24:49
3,379  Emily Perkinson SO 24:57
3,463  Kaley Doyle FR 25:23
National Rank #230 of 341
South Region Rank #27 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 2.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren Tarovisky Brooke Sill Courtney Corradetti Regan Farrow Alicen Wilbur Stephanie Cajas Anita Munoz Amanda Restivo Emily Perkinson Kaley Doyle
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/04 1261 22:00 21:56 22:26 22:30 22:37 22:57 22:53
FSU Invitational 10/10 1267 21:53 21:57 22:11 22:54 22:34 23:22 24:49 24:57 25:23
Atlantic Sun Championships 11/01 1251 21:54 21:38 22:22 22:20 22:17 22:55 22:28
South Region Championships 11/14 1258 21:51 22:08 22:26 22:21 23:03 22:22 22:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.5 709 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.3 3.9 5.7 9.1 13.8 20.5 32.3 7.4 1.3 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Tarovisky 118.4
Brooke Sill 120.9
Courtney Corradetti 148.9
Regan Farrow 159.9
Alicen Wilbur 168.8
Stephanie Cajas 174.0
Anita Munoz 174.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 0.3% 0.3 18
19 0.6% 0.6 19
20 0.9% 0.9 20
21 1.5% 1.5 21
22 2.3% 2.3 22
23 3.9% 3.9 23
24 5.7% 5.7 24
25 9.1% 9.1 25
26 13.8% 13.8 26
27 20.5% 20.5 27
28 32.3% 32.3 28
29 7.4% 7.4 29
30 1.3% 1.3 30
31 0.2% 0.2 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0