Iona
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1  Kate Avery JR 18:38
46  Rosie Clarke JR 19:47
70  Tara Jameson SR 19:56
330  Melissa Hawtin JR 20:40
375  Regina Neumeyer JR 20:45
630  Marlene Delices SR 21:07
851  Jessica Scheriff FR 21:23
1,528  Natalie Holder FR 22:05
1,613  Zoe Wojtech SO 22:10
1,765  Rachel Garn FR 22:20
2,110  Danika Jensen FR 22:41
2,781  Kaleigh Constantine FR 23:33
2,853  Kara McKenna FR 23:41
3,747  Caitlin Bravo FR 27:50
3,755  Kerri Sexton SO 27:55
National Rank #14 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #1 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 90.6%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 1.3%
Top 10 at Nationals 19.8%
Top 20 at Nationals 83.0%


Regional Champion 57.3%
Top 5 in Regional 97.8%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kate Avery Rosie Clarke Tara Jameson Melissa Hawtin Regina Neumeyer Marlene Delices Jessica Scheriff Natalie Holder Zoe Wojtech Rachel Garn Danika Jensen
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 755 19:40 19:54 20:37 21:23 21:38 22:18 21:54 22:52
NYC Metro Championships 10/10
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 668 19:44 19:51 20:14 21:00 21:26 21:58 22:49
Princeton Invitational 10/18 1496 22:26 22:43
MAAC Championships 10/31 698 18:42 20:23 20:22 20:57 21:27 21:07 21:24 22:04 22:06 22:15 22:29
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 430 19:12 19:35 19:41 21:06 20:29 20:52 21:12
NCAA Championship 11/22 471 18:31 19:52 20:01 20:33 20:40 21:16 21:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 90.6% 14.1 406 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.7 4.6 6.6 6.6 7.0 8.2 8.7 7.5 7.2 5.9 5.3 4.0 2.9 2.6 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
Region Championship 100% 1.8 103 57.3 22.7 10.2 5.0 2.5 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Avery 100% 1.0 56.3 19.9 9.6 5.3 3.5 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rosie Clarke 97.3% 50.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.4
Tara Jameson 91.1% 69.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Melissa Hawtin 90.6% 187.9
Regina Neumeyer 90.6% 197.8
Marlene Delices 90.6% 233.1
Jessica Scheriff 90.6% 246.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Avery 1.0 95.9 4.1 0.0
Rosie Clarke 6.3 1.2 11.2 12.4 12.0 10.8 9.4 8.6 6.4 6.4 5.0 3.7 3.3 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0
Tara Jameson 9.4 0.3 2.7 4.7 6.5 7.5 8.3 8.3 8.8 7.8 7.3 6.4 5.0 4.9 4.3 3.8 2.9 2.2 2.1 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4
Melissa Hawtin 36.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.8
Regina Neumeyer 41.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Marlene Delices 74.7 0.0 0.0
Jessica Scheriff 102.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 57.3% 100.0% 57.3 57.3 1
2 22.7% 100.0% 22.7 22.7 2
3 10.2% 76.3% 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 2.4 7.8 3
4 5.0% 45.4% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 2.7 2.3 4
5 2.5% 20.5% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.0 0.5 5
6 1.3% 3.1% 0.0 1.2 0.0 6
7 0.6% 0.6 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.2% 0.2 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 90.6% 57.3 22.7 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.6 9.4 80.0 10.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Providence 53.2% 1.0 0.5
William and Mary 52.5% 1.0 0.5
Notre Dame 49.0% 1.0 0.5
BYU 42.7% 1.0 0.4
SMU 18.3% 1.0 0.2
Columbia 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 1.1% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 2.0 0.0
Indiana 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Miss State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.3
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 7.0