Iowa
Men
-
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
706 |
Carolyn Newhouse |
SO |
21:12 |
751 |
Katie Adams |
SO |
21:16 |
766 |
Samantha Zishka |
SO |
21:17 |
890 |
Marta Bote Gonzalez |
FR |
21:26 |
934 |
Jocelyn Todd |
JR |
21:28 |
1,053 |
Tess Wilberding |
SO |
21:37 |
1,090 |
Courtney Martin |
JR |
21:39 |
1,172 |
Lisa Gordon |
SO |
21:44 |
1,789 |
Kelly Breen |
FR |
22:21 |
2,173 |
Anne Reischmann |
SO |
22:44 |
2,253 |
Courtney Bruns |
FR |
22:50 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.2% |
Top 10 in Regional |
7.9% |
Top 20 in Regional |
92.6% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Carolyn Newhouse |
Katie Adams |
Samantha Zishka |
Marta Bote Gonzalez |
Jocelyn Todd |
Tess Wilberding |
Courtney Martin |
Lisa Gordon |
Kelly Breen |
Anne Reischmann |
Courtney Bruns |
Notre Dame Invitational (Gold) |
10/03 |
1204 |
21:25 |
21:34 |
21:48 |
21:29 |
21:35 |
21:31 |
21:41 |
21:44 |
|
|
22:50 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) |
10/18 |
1131 |
20:54 |
20:59 |
21:22 |
|
21:25 |
21:45 |
21:34 |
|
|
|
|
Big Ten Conference Championships |
11/02 |
1132 |
21:13 |
20:55 |
21:03 |
21:37 |
21:21 |
22:00 |
21:35 |
|
22:21 |
22:44 |
|
Midwest Region Championships |
11/14 |
1151 |
21:13 |
21:36 |
21:05 |
21:09 |
21:35 |
21:13 |
21:44 |
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
31.0 |
894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
15.5 |
440 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
6.4 |
7.7 |
9.4 |
12.6 |
14.0 |
12.5 |
8.0 |
6.0 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Carolyn Newhouse |
0.0% |
209.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katie Adams |
0.0% |
219.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samantha Zishka |
0.0% |
184.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marta Bote Gonzalez |
0.0% |
230.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jocelyn Todd |
0.0% |
227.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tess Wilberding |
0.0% |
244.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Courtney Martin |
0.0% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Carolyn Newhouse |
76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Katie Adams |
82.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samantha Zishka |
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Marta Bote Gonzalez |
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jocelyn Todd |
103.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tess Wilberding |
116.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Courtney Martin |
120.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.0% |
50.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
0.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
1.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
2.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
2.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
4.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
6.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
7.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
14.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
8.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
27 |
28 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |