Loyola Marymount
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
82  Danielle Shanahan SO 19:58
102  Grace Graham-Zamudio SR 20:04
438  Kayla de Bondt SO 20:51
715  Chloe Curtis SR 21:13
758  Kelli Sugimoto JR 21:16
1,203  Kyra Burke SO 21:46
1,407  Lorena Garcia SO 21:58
1,532  Samantha Garcia JR 22:05
2,225  Kelly Parsons JR 22:48
2,469  Marisa Carino FR 23:06
2,620  Taylor Paschen SR 23:18
2,699  Evelyn Gonzalez JR 23:26
2,770  Alexandra Young JR 23:32
2,904  Jessica Gonzales FR 23:46
National Rank #43 of 341
West Region Rank #9 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 1.3%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 1.1%
Top 10 in Regional 51.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Danielle Shanahan Grace Graham-Zamudio Kayla de Bondt Chloe Curtis Kelli Sugimoto Kyra Burke Lorena Garcia Samantha Garcia Kelly Parsons Marisa Carino Taylor Paschen
Stanford Invitational 09/27 859 20:08 20:14 20:41 21:19 23:38 21:59 21:36 22:41 22:53
Vanguard Invitational 10/11 1295 21:31 21:41 23:02 23:05 23:05
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 778 19:45 19:51 20:56 21:18 21:15 22:00
CS Fullerton Titan 10/24 1413 23:06 23:57
West Coast Championships 11/01 801 19:59 20:12 20:59 21:04 20:46 21:45 22:13 21:52
West Region Championships 11/14 773 20:01 19:59 20:46 21:14 20:54 22:15 22:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 1.3% 25.7 576 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 10.5 316 0.2 0.9 2.1 4.3 9.1 16.0 19.1 16.9 15.2 9.2 4.3 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Danielle Shanahan 36.7% 65.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Grace Graham-Zamudio 19.3% 77.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kayla de Bondt 1.3% 177.2
Chloe Curtis 1.3% 214.2
Kelli Sugimoto 1.3% 223.8
Kyra Burke 1.3% 248.4
Lorena Garcia 1.3% 250.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Danielle Shanahan 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 3.0 4.4 6.1 6.0 5.7 6.0 5.6 4.4 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.2 4.1 3.2 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 1.8 2.3
Grace Graham-Zamudio 18.9 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.0 2.4 3.1 4.1 3.9 4.3 4.5 4.1 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.4 2.9
Kayla de Bondt 68.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Chloe Curtis 100.8
Kelli Sugimoto 105.9
Kyra Burke 148.4
Lorena Garcia 166.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.2% 87.5% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4
5 0.9% 55.6% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.5 5
6 2.1% 27.1% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.6 6
7 4.3% 1.8% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.1 7
8 9.1% 9.1 8
9 16.0% 16.0 9
10 19.1% 19.1 10
11 16.9% 16.9 11
12 15.2% 15.2 12
13 9.2% 9.2 13
14 4.3% 4.3 14
15 1.5% 1.5 15
16 0.9% 0.9 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 1.3% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 98.7 0.0 1.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0