Pepperdine
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,056  Katie Engel JR 21:37
1,208  Lindsay Sheaffer SO 21:46
1,889  Lisa Santroch SO 22:28
2,099  Elle Lemco SO 22:40
2,793  Ellie Smith SO 23:35
3,011  Sydney Gray SO 23:57
3,069  Terra Atwood FR 24:05
3,080  Rachel Rant JR 24:06
3,296  Chandler Smith FR 24:40
3,416  Alex Campana FR 25:07
3,494  Kateryna Kononenko FR 25:34
3,838  Vivian Kim FR 32:13
National Rank #245 of 341
West Region Rank #35 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katie Engel Lindsay Sheaffer Lisa Santroch Elle Lemco Ellie Smith Sydney Gray Terra Atwood Rachel Rant Chandler Smith Alex Campana Kateryna Kononenko
Stanford Invitational 09/27 1325 21:27 21:47 22:19 23:40 24:01 24:40
UC Riverside Highlander 10/18 1353 23:11 21:53 22:32 23:40 24:00 23:57 23:46 23:49 25:07 25:34
West Coast Championships 11/01 1274 21:30 21:42 22:32 22:33 23:27 24:06 24:19 23:53 25:47
West Region Championships 11/14 1333 21:17 21:39 22:25 22:47 25:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 33.0 953 0.0 0.1 1.0 2.6 6.1 13.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katie Engel 135.6
Lindsay Sheaffer 148.8
Lisa Santroch 202.9
Elle Lemco 214.7
Ellie Smith 251.0
Sydney Gray 259.3
Terra Atwood 261.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 1.0% 1.0 28
29 2.6% 2.6 29
30 6.1% 6.1 30
31 13.0% 13.0 31
32 17.1% 17.1 32
33 19.4% 19.4 33
34 16.3% 16.3 34
35 12.4% 12.4 35
36 8.0% 8.0 36
37 4.0% 4.0 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0