Troy
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,523  Mikayla Hodges SO 22:05
1,719  Julia Ostendorf JR 22:16
2,527  Marsel Mosley SO 23:10
2,581  Samantha Smith SO 23:15
2,757  Sarah Zylstra FR 23:31
3,231  Katrina Bokenfohr SO 24:28
3,428  Sara Lane SO 25:10
3,498  Stephanie Newman FR 25:35
3,518  Kristina Bokenfohr SO 25:40
3,560  Rae Leach SO 25:53
3,639  Alyssa Staubach FR 26:31
National Rank #267 of 341
South Region Rank #31 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Mikayla Hodges Julia Ostendorf Marsel Mosley Samantha Smith Sarah Zylstra Katrina Bokenfohr Sara Lane Stephanie Newman Kristina Bokenfohr Rae Leach Alyssa Staubach
Foothills Invitational 10/04 1578 22:32 24:25 24:52 25:35 25:39 25:53 26:30
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1343 22:01 21:59 23:46 23:01 23:35 25:19 25:35
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/02 1326 22:09 22:18 22:41 23:30 23:28 23:59





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.6 903 0.0 0.1 0.5 6.3 15.9 20.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mikayla Hodges 132.0
Julia Ostendorf 144.2
Marsel Mosley 202.7
Samantha Smith 206.7
Sarah Zylstra 218.8
Katrina Bokenfohr 253.6
Sara Lane 267.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.5% 0.5 28
29 6.3% 6.3 29
30 15.9% 15.9 30
31 20.5% 20.5 31
32 25.1% 25.1 32
33 29.7% 29.7 33
34 1.9% 1.9 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0