Tulane
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
778  Emma Newton FR 21:18
972  Lauren Bartels FR 21:31
1,811  Katharine Smiley SO 22:23
1,828  Emily-Kathryn Hoey FR 22:24
2,119  Mikayla Sonneborn JR 22:41
2,579  Jessica Adamson SO 23:14
2,607  Erika Chelales FR 23:16
2,615  Merritt Miller FR 23:17
2,768  Madeline Held FR 23:32
2,816  Laura Krasovec FR 23:38
3,152  Jennifer LaMori FR 24:17
3,289  Allison Wegner SO 24:39
3,311  Michelle Kreutzberg JR 24:43
National Rank #206 of 341
South Central Region Rank #17 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 98.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma Newton Lauren Bartels Katharine Smiley Emily-Kathryn Hoey Mikayla Sonneborn Jessica Adamson Erika Chelales Merritt Miller Madeline Held Laura Krasovec Jennifer LaMori
McNeese State Cowboy Stampeded 09/27 1233 21:05 21:42 22:11 22:31 22:45 23:19 23:15 23:17 23:22 23:38 24:09
McNeese Cowboy Stampede 09/27 1233 21:05 21:42 22:11 22:31 22:45 23:19 23:15 23:17 23:22 23:38 24:09
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Brown) 10/04 1243 21:10 21:38 22:13 22:13 23:01 23:09
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1268 21:21 22:47 22:14 22:44 22:48 24:04 24:42
American Athletic Conference Championships 10/31 1263 21:24 22:27 22:17 22:32 23:00 23:54
South Central Region Championships 11/14 1246 22:39 21:14 22:34 22:28 22:16 23:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.3 464 0.0 0.1 2.4 7.9 11.8 15.0 16.3 15.3 14.2 11.5 4.1 1.2 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Newton 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.1
Lauren Bartels 66.8
Katharine Smiley 108.6
Emily-Kathryn Hoey 109.4
Mikayla Sonneborn 123.7
Jessica Adamson 150.7
Erika Chelales 152.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 2.4% 2.4 12
13 7.9% 7.9 13
14 11.8% 11.8 14
15 15.0% 15.0 15
16 16.3% 16.3 16
17 15.3% 15.3 17
18 14.2% 14.2 18
19 11.5% 11.5 19
20 4.1% 4.1 20
21 1.2% 1.2 21
22 0.3% 0.3 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0