Tulsa
Men
-
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
236 |
Brandi Krieg |
SR |
20:29 |
256 |
Clara Langley |
SO |
20:32 |
459 |
Nicole Lee |
FR |
20:53 |
502 |
Stacie Taylor |
SO |
20:56 |
509 |
Anna Bearss |
FR |
20:57 |
541 |
Natasha Cockram |
SR |
21:00 |
576 |
Olivia Lopez |
SO |
21:03 |
1,061 |
Olivia O'Hare |
SO |
21:37 |
1,291 |
Danielle Medearis |
FR |
21:51 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.4% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
73.2% |
Top 10 in Regional |
98.2% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Brandi Krieg |
Clara Langley |
Nicole Lee |
Stacie Taylor |
Anna Bearss |
Natasha Cockram |
Olivia Lopez |
Olivia O'Hare |
Danielle Medearis |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/03 |
987 |
20:29 |
20:55 |
20:50 |
21:03 |
21:00 |
21:01 |
21:19 |
21:40 |
21:47 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/18 |
901 |
20:43 |
20:18 |
20:56 |
21:44 |
20:46 |
21:08 |
20:53 |
|
|
American Athletic Conference Championships |
10/31 |
769 |
20:18 |
20:18 |
20:54 |
20:29 |
20:52 |
20:42 |
20:50 |
21:33 |
21:57 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/14 |
917 |
20:27 |
20:39 |
20:54 |
20:40 |
21:07 |
21:05 |
21:07 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
8.5% |
28.0 |
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
Region Championship |
100% |
4.7 |
202 |
|
7.3 |
24.6 |
22.6 |
18.7 |
11.4 |
6.9 |
3.3 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Brandi Krieg |
8.9% |
131.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clara Langley |
8.7% |
137.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicole Lee |
8.5% |
191.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacie Taylor |
8.5% |
199.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anna Bearss |
8.5% |
202.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natasha Cockram |
8.5% |
206.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olivia Lopez |
8.5% |
211.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Brandi Krieg |
23.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.0 |
Clara Langley |
26.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
4.1 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
Nicole Lee |
49.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
Stacie Taylor |
52.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
Anna Bearss |
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
Natasha Cockram |
58.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
Olivia Lopez |
62.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
7.3% |
100.0% |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
2 |
3 |
24.6% |
4.6% |
| |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
23.4 |
|
1.1 |
3 |
4 |
22.6% |
0.2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
22.6 |
|
0.0 |
4 |
5 |
18.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
11.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
6.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
3.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
2.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
1.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
8.5% |
|
7.3 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
91.5 |
7.3 |
1.2 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
SMU |
18.3% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Yale |
2.9% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Missouri |
2.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Wyoming |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Rice |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Kansas State |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Southern Illinois |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Colorado St. |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Butler |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Connecticut |
0.0% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Furman |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Elon |
0.0% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Eastern Kentucky |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
3.0 |