USC
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
367  Katerina Berdousi SO 20:44
749  Erica Capellino SR 21:16
1,195  Kira Soderstrom SR 21:45
1,504  Jenna Tong JR 22:04
1,554  Reika Kijima JR 22:07
1,711  Amber Bragdon FR 22:16
2,244  Jessica Lesser FR 22:50
2,677  Natasha Strickland JR 23:23
2,905  Emma Kao FR 23:46
3,173  Kimberly Groff FR 24:19
3,452  Mackensie Peace FR 25:19
National Rank #147 of 341
West Region Rank #25 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 15.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katerina Berdousi Erica Capellino Kira Soderstrom Jenna Tong Reika Kijima Amber Bragdon Jessica Lesser Natasha Strickland Emma Kao Kimberly Groff Mackensie Peace
Stanford Invitational 09/27 1145 20:32 21:24 21:37 22:06 22:12 22:22 22:52
Dual at the Rose Bowl 10/09 1176 20:48 21:57 21:43 22:38 21:30 21:56 22:42 23:52 23:02 25:11 24:37
UC Riverside Highlander 10/18 1229 21:02 21:38 22:28 22:13 22:50 23:17 23:55 24:08 25:28
Pac-12 Championships 10/31 1150 20:54 20:48 21:55 22:09 22:19 22:51 23:45
West Region Championships 11/14 1125 20:29 21:19 21:56 21:37 21:51





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.2 663 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.3 2.5 4.3 6.3 9.8 12.1 14.1 15.0 15.0 10.5 4.7 2.2 1.1 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katerina Berdousi 0.0% 173.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katerina Berdousi 60.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Erica Capellino 104.8
Kira Soderstrom 147.2
Jenna Tong 175.2
Reika Kijima 178.5
Amber Bragdon 189.6
Jessica Lesser 223.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 1.3% 1.3 17
18 2.5% 2.5 18
19 4.3% 4.3 19
20 6.3% 6.3 20
21 9.8% 9.8 21
22 12.1% 12.1 22
23 14.1% 14.1 23
24 15.0% 15.0 24
25 15.0% 15.0 25
26 10.5% 10.5 26
27 4.7% 4.7 27
28 2.2% 2.2 28
29 1.1% 1.1 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0