Utah
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
301  Rebekah Winterton SR 20:37
370  Sarah Feeny FR 20:44
462  Jessica Sams SO 20:54
476  Shaylen Crook FR 20:55
539  Hannah McInturff FR 21:00
736  Nikki Rietz SR 21:15
941  Andrea Chavez JR 21:29
1,029  Lauren Mills JR 21:35
1,158  Sadie Wassum FR 21:43
1,348  Dakota Grossman FR 21:55
1,412  Dana Snell SO 21:58
1,669  Makenzie Clark SO 22:13
National Rank #76 of 341
Mountain Region Rank #6 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.8%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 28.8%
Top 10 in Regional 98.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebekah Winterton Sarah Feeny Jessica Sams Shaylen Crook Hannah McInturff Nikki Rietz Andrea Chavez Lauren Mills Sadie Wassum Dakota Grossman Dana Snell
Washington Invitational 10/04 964 20:21 21:18 21:00 20:46 20:54 21:12 21:17 21:20 21:43 21:42 21:54
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 893 20:29 20:26 20:57 20:51 20:47 21:12 21:53
Pac-12 Championships 10/31 985 20:49 20:42 20:51 20:52 21:00 21:31 21:40 21:37 22:07 22:01
Mountain Region Championships 11/14 1041 20:54 20:43 20:48 21:28 21:35 21:09 21:30





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.8% 28.7 675 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4
Region Championship 100% 6.5 214 0.0 2.3 9.7 16.7 23.2 21.6 15.2 6.8 2.7 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebekah Winterton 5.0% 155.5
Sarah Feeny 2.1% 165.3
Jessica Sams 1.0% 186.0
Shaylen Crook 0.9% 190.0
Hannah McInturff 0.8% 200.0
Nikki Rietz 0.8% 226.0
Andrea Chavez 0.8% 240.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebekah Winterton 30.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.6 2.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 3.3 3.3
Sarah Feeny 36.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.1
Jessica Sams 45.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.6
Shaylen Crook 47.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8
Hannah McInturff 51.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.3
Nikki Rietz 65.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Andrea Chavez 80.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 2
3 2.3% 32.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.6 0.7 3
4 9.7% 9.7 4
5 16.7% 16.7 5
6 23.2% 23.2 6
7 21.6% 21.6 7
8 15.2% 15.2 8
9 6.8% 6.8 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 1.3% 1.3 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.8% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 99.2 0.0 0.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Tulsa 7.4% 1.0 0.1
Bradley 4.7% 1.0 0.0
Yale 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Rice 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0