Vanderbilt
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
133  Carmen Carlos SO 20:12
149  Claire Benjamin SR 20:14
160  Katherine Delaney JR 20:16
171  Sara Barron JR 20:18
194  Amira Joseph SR 20:21
324  Lily Williams SO 20:39
356  Reagan Anderson SO 20:43
382  Rebecca Chandler SR 20:46
390  Emma Abrahamson FR 20:47
403  Megan Huebner FR 20:48
410  Vanessa Valentine JR 20:48
726  Maddie Criscione FR 21:14
732  Hannah Jumper JR 21:14
1,278  Courtney Kriegshauser FR 21:50
National Rank #20 of 341
South Region Rank #2 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.9%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 1.2%
Top 10 at Nationals 10.1%
Top 20 at Nationals 52.3%


Regional Champion 56.5%
Top 5 in Regional 99.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Carmen Carlos Claire Benjamin Katherine Delaney Sara Barron Amira Joseph Lily Williams Reagan Anderson Rebecca Chandler Emma Abrahamson Megan Huebner Vanessa Valentine
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 533 20:18 20:46 20:44 20:07 20:02 20:14 20:24 20:40 20:48 20:48 20:21
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 475 19:51 20:04 20:02 20:24 20:15 21:14
SEC Championship 10/31 591 20:34 20:14 19:51 20:15 20:26 21:00 20:57 20:37 20:46 20:38
South Region Championships 11/14 528 20:09 20:03 20:15 20:09 20:25 20:47 20:54
NCAA Championship 11/22 735 20:11 20:18 20:43 20:37 20:36 20:40 21:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.9% 19.7 496 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.3 3.7 3.4 4.8 4.5 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.1 4.9 5.3 5.1 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.5 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7
Region Championship 100% 1.5 60 56.5 41.3 1.9 0.2 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Carmen Carlos 99.9% 116.5
Claire Benjamin 99.9% 123.2 0.0
Katherine Delaney 99.9% 129.8 0.0
Sara Barron 99.9% 135.4
Amira Joseph 99.9% 143.9
Lily Williams 99.9% 189.7
Reagan Anderson 99.9% 195.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Carmen Carlos 8.4 0.1 1.7 6.4 8.2 9.2 11.0 9.3 9.5 7.7 7.2 5.8 5.0 3.6 3.2 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
Claire Benjamin 9.7 0.0 0.1 0.8 4.4 5.3 7.6 8.7 9.9 8.0 8.2 7.3 6.3 6.2 5.5 4.3 3.7 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
Katherine Delaney 10.4 0.1 0.8 2.6 4.3 6.3 7.8 8.2 8.3 8.6 7.2 7.3 6.2 5.1 4.4 3.9 3.3 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7
Sara Barron 11.5 0.0 0.4 1.8 3.1 4.7 6.7 6.7 7.0 8.2 7.9 7.4 6.5 6.0 5.0 4.4 3.9 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 0.9
Amira Joseph 12.9 0.0 0.2 1.0 1.7 3.2 3.8 5.6 6.6 6.7 7.8 6.9 7.2 5.9 5.8 5.1 4.8 4.2 3.3 2.8 2.6 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.4
Lily Williams 24.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.6 1.9 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.4 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 3.6 3.9
Reagan Anderson 27.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.8 3.0 2.4 2.9 3.1 3.7 4.2 3.4 3.8 3.2 3.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 56.5% 100.0% 56.5 56.5 1
2 41.3% 100.0% 41.3 41.3 2
3 1.9% 100.0% 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.9 3
4 0.2% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 99.9% 56.5 41.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 97.8 2.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
North Carolina 99.2% 1.0 1.0
Minnesota 98.1% 1.0 1.0
Boise State 97.6% 1.0 1.0
Washington 90.1% 1.0 0.9
Iona 84.9% 1.0 0.8
Ohio State 84.5% 1.0 0.8
Syracuse 82.3% 1.0 0.8
Toledo 67.0% 1.0 0.7
Arizona State 64.7% 1.0 0.6
UCLA 62.5% 1.0 0.6
Boston College 55.0% 1.0 0.6
Providence 53.2% 1.0 0.5
William and Mary 52.5% 1.0 0.5
Notre Dame 49.0% 1.0 0.5
Dartmouth 48.8% 1.0 0.5
BYU 42.7% 2.0 0.9
SMU 18.3% 1.0 0.2
Columbia 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 2.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 1.1% 1.0 0.0
California 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 2.0 0.0
Auburn 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Illinois 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 3.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Miss State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 12.1
Minimum 6.0
Maximum 17.0