Washington St.
Men
-
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
81 |
Abby Regan |
SR |
19:58 |
526 |
CharLee Linton |
JR |
20:59 |
570 |
Devon Bortfeld |
FR |
21:02 |
622 |
Morgan Willson |
SO |
21:06 |
702 |
Ashlie Standow |
SO |
21:12 |
943 |
Ruby Roberts |
SR |
21:29 |
994 |
Emily Dwyer |
JR |
21:33 |
1,463 |
Steffie Pavey |
SO |
22:02 |
1,900 |
Abby Knight |
JR |
22:28 |
|
National Rank |
#69 of 341 |
West Region Rank |
#13 of 39 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.2% |
Most Likely Finish |
13th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
18.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Abby Regan |
CharLee Linton |
Devon Bortfeld |
Morgan Willson |
Ashlie Standow |
Ruby Roberts |
Emily Dwyer |
Steffie Pavey |
Abby Knight |
Stanford Invitational |
09/27 |
912 |
19:38 |
21:14 |
21:02 |
20:43 |
21:55 |
|
21:38 |
21:47 |
23:03 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) |
10/18 |
915 |
20:02 |
21:01 |
21:01 |
21:13 |
|
20:41 |
21:36 |
22:01 |
|
Pac-12 Championships |
10/31 |
934 |
19:55 |
20:55 |
21:04 |
21:06 |
21:00 |
22:20 |
21:23 |
22:05 |
21:57 |
West Region Championships |
11/14 |
1006 |
20:27 |
20:49 |
21:02 |
21:17 |
21:01 |
|
21:38 |
22:17 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.2% |
27.9 |
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
12.5 |
372 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
2.2 |
5.4 |
9.6 |
13.5 |
16.2 |
19.7 |
16.0 |
8.5 |
4.2 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Abby Regan |
38.2% |
67.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
CharLee Linton |
0.2% |
180.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devon Bortfeld |
0.2% |
190.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Willson |
0.2% |
197.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashlie Standow |
0.2% |
217.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Roberts |
0.2% |
233.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily Dwyer |
0.2% |
239.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Abby Regan |
14.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.6 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
4.8 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
CharLee Linton |
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devon Bortfeld |
85.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Willson |
91.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashlie Standow |
99.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruby Roberts |
124.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily Dwyer |
130.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
4 |
5 |
0.1% |
66.7% |
| |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
5 |
6 |
0.4% |
31.6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
6 |
7 |
0.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
2.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
5.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
9.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
13.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
16.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
19.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
16.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
8.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
4.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
99.8 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Southern Illinois |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |