Yale
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
67  Kira Garry SR 19:55
328  Sami Glass FR 20:40
471  Emily Stark JR 20:54
495  Dana Klein FR 20:56
561  Kelli Reagan FR 21:02
590  Elizabeth McDonald JR 21:03
852  Emily Waligurski SO 21:23
961  Frances Schmiede 21:31
1,233  Anna Demaree SR 21:48
1,268  Kate Raphael FR 21:50
1,318  Hannah Alpert SR 21:52
1,372  Shannon McDonnell JR 21:56
1,378  Melissa Fairchild 21:57
1,406  Grace Brittan JR 21:58
1,426  Meredith Rizzo SO 21:59
1,908  Emily Barnes 22:29
1,982  Delaney FitzPatrick 22:33
1,998  Jennie Callan SO 22:34
2,471  Clare Carroll FR 23:06
2,617  Sarah Healy FR 23:18
2,767  Rachel Jones SO 23:32
2,945  Julia Borowski FR 23:50
National Rank #53 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #8 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 8.1%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.4%


Regional Champion 0.5%
Top 5 in Regional 22.8%
Top 10 in Regional 83.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Kira Garry Sami Glass Emily Stark Dana Klein Kelli Reagan Elizabeth McDonald Emily Waligurski Frances Schmiede Anna Demaree Kate Raphael Hannah Alpert
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 845 19:55 20:51 20:47 20:45 20:54 21:10 22:39 21:41
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1293 22:28 21:30
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 862 19:56 20:36 20:48 21:05 20:57 21:12 21:21
CCSU Mini Meet 10/24 1228 21:28 21:38 21:48
Ivy League Championships 11/01 868 19:56 20:34 20:56 20:58 21:07 21:02 21:11 21:33 21:34 22:00 22:14
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 907 19:51 21:08 20:53 21:08 20:51 21:08
NCAA Championship 11/22 20:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 8.1% 27.2 629 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.2
Region Championship 100% 7.7 224 0.5 2.2 4.3 6.5 9.3 11.2 12.4 13.3 13.1 10.7 9.3 4.7 1.9 0.4 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kira Garry 61.3% 63.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6
Sami Glass 8.1% 154.9
Emily Stark 8.1% 192.8
Dana Klein 8.1% 195.0
Kelli Reagan 8.1% 208.1
Elizabeth McDonald 8.1% 211.1
Emily Waligurski 8.1% 239.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kira Garry 9.1 0.3 4.4 6.4 7.1 7.9 7.1 7.9 8.3 6.6 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.7 3.9 3.5 2.8 2.5 1.7 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.3
Sami Glass 36.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.6
Emily Stark 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4
Dana Klein 57.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Kelli Reagan 67.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Elizabeth McDonald 69.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Emily Waligurski 102.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.5% 100.0% 0.5 0.5 1
2 2.2% 100.0% 2.2 2.2 2
3 4.3% 56.7% 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.9 2.5 3
4 6.5% 26.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.8 1.7 4
5 9.3% 9.9% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 8.4 0.9 5
6 11.2% 2.3% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.3 6
7 12.4% 0.3% 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 7
8 13.3% 13.3 8
9 13.1% 13.1 9
10 10.7% 10.7 10
11 9.3% 9.3 11
12 4.7% 4.7 12
13 1.9% 1.9 13
14 0.4% 0.4 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 8.1% 0.5 2.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.1 91.9 2.7 5.4




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Iona 84.9% 1.0 0.8
Alabama 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.7% 2.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Miss State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.9
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0