Clemson
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
108  Grace Barnett JR 20:02
268  Kaley Ciluffo FR 20:30
650  Evie Tate JR 21:08
764  Catherine Herring JR 21:17
1,011  Elizabeth Dawson SO 21:35
1,196  Ersula Farrow FR 21:49
1,211  Brianna Feerst JR 21:50
1,359  Anna Johnson FR 22:00
1,522  Emily Headley FR 22:11
1,845  Madison Huffman JR 22:32
2,013  Katie Fortner SO 22:43
National Rank #71 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #9 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.2%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 5.0%
Top 10 in Regional 68.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Grace Barnett Kaley Ciluffo Evie Tate Catherine Herring Elizabeth Dawson Ersula Farrow Brianna Feerst Anna Johnson Emily Headley Madison Huffman Katie Fortner
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/02 990 20:10 21:12 20:47 21:25 21:27 21:14 21:58
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 905 19:56 20:23 21:07 21:25 21:35 22:04 22:24
ACC Championships 10/30 877 19:48 20:16 21:26 21:12 21:37 21:33 21:52 22:24 22:31 22:45
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 1085 20:25 21:13 21:06 21:47 21:52 22:12 22:37





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.2% 28.8 699 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 9.4 318 0.7 4.4 9.8 13.6 14.2 13.6 12.0 10.5 7.6 5.0 3.6 2.7 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Grace Barnett 10.0% 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Kaley Ciluffo 0.3% 124.5
Evie Tate 0.2% 210.0
Catherine Herring 0.2% 226.0
Elizabeth Dawson 0.2% 243.0
Ersula Farrow 0.2% 247.3
Brianna Feerst 0.2% 249.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Grace Barnett 16.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.6 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.8 5.0 4.4 4.9 5.3 6.3 5.3 5.5 5.8 5.5 4.9 4.7 3.9 3.8 2.9 2.4
Kaley Ciluffo 33.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 3.1 3.1
Evie Tate 71.5
Catherine Herring 82.5
Elizabeth Dawson 110.4
Ersula Farrow 134.5
Brianna Feerst 135.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.7% 29.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 4
5 4.4% 4.4 5
6 9.8% 9.8 6
7 13.6% 13.6 7
8 14.2% 14.2 8
9 13.6% 13.6 9
10 12.0% 12.0 10
11 10.5% 10.5 11
12 7.6% 7.6 12
13 5.0% 5.0 13
14 3.6% 3.6 14
15 2.7% 2.7 15
16 1.3% 1.3 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 0.0 0.2




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Missouri 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.7
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0