Drake
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
209  Emma Huston SR 20:22
548  Krista Maguire SR 20:59
965  Taylor Scholl SR 21:32
1,354  Cassie Aerts SR 21:59
1,538  Bailee Cofer SO 22:12
1,897  Meghan Kearney FR 22:35
2,285  Laura Gann SR 23:06
2,306  Erica Bestul JR 23:07
2,803  Elana Breitenbucher SO 24:04
2,840  Katie Berger SO 24:11
2,943  Shelby Varney JR 24:33
3,195  Theresa McAlister FR 25:53
National Rank #119 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #16 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.7%
Top 20 in Regional 67.2%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma Huston Krista Maguire Taylor Scholl Cassie Aerts Bailee Cofer Meghan Kearney Laura Gann Erica Bestul Elana Breitenbucher Katie Berger Shelby Varney
Roy Griak Invitational 09/26 1157 20:33 21:43 21:56 21:56 22:16 23:01 23:29
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1056 20:22 20:37 21:35 23:05 22:19 22:43 22:56 24:03 23:53 24:17
Bradley 'Pink' Classic Invitational (Red) 10/16 1096 20:25 21:00 21:36 21:56 22:15 22:17 23:12 24:09 24:34 24:54
Missouri Valley Conference Championships 10/31 1077 20:20 21:02 21:17 21:48 22:10 22:35 23:04 22:59
Midwest Region Championships 11/13 1053 20:14 20:53 21:27 21:56 22:07 22:31 23:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.8 503 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.9 3.1 4.6 5.1 7.3 9.1 11.7 11.2 11.6 11.4 8.0 6.8 3.8 1.7 0.9 0.3 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Huston 0.7% 113.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Huston 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 3.1 2.9 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.8
Krista Maguire 58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Taylor Scholl 105.7
Cassie Aerts 146.5
Bailee Cofer 165.8
Meghan Kearney 191.8
Laura Gann 211.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.2% 0.2 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 0.8% 0.8 11
12 1.9% 1.9 12
13 3.1% 3.1 13
14 4.6% 4.6 14
15 5.1% 5.1 15
16 7.3% 7.3 16
17 9.1% 9.1 17
18 11.7% 11.7 18
19 11.2% 11.2 19
20 11.6% 11.6 20
21 11.4% 11.4 21
22 8.0% 8.0 22
23 6.8% 6.8 23
24 3.8% 3.8 24
25 1.7% 1.7 25
26 0.9% 0.9 26
27 0.3% 0.3 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0