Elon
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
335  Elyse Bierut SR 20:39
387  Kimberly Johansen JR 20:44
708  Shelby Cuddeback JR 21:13
873  Coralea Geraniotis FR 21:25
1,013  Kaitlin Snapp SR 21:35
1,189  Brigid Brennan SO 21:48
1,519  Chelsea Smith FR 22:11
1,633  Corey Weiss SO 22:18
1,931  Sabina Bains JR 22:38
2,788  Alicia DeCastro FR 24:01
National Rank #115 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #15 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.7%
Top 10 in Regional 32.5%
Top 20 in Regional 99.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Elyse Bierut Kimberly Johansen Shelby Cuddeback Coralea Geraniotis Kaitlin Snapp Brigid Brennan Chelsea Smith Corey Weiss Sabina Bains Alicia DeCastro
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/03 1117 20:39 20:58 21:27 21:46 21:52 22:09 22:26 22:29 24:13
Wake Forest Invitational 10/16 1160 20:43 23:04 21:28 22:12 21:36 21:46 22:20 22:02 22:47 23:52
Colonial Athletic Association Championship 10/31 1046 20:40 20:34 21:13 21:21 21:38 22:01 22:11 22:26 22:40
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 988 20:41 20:19 21:20 21:05 21:20 21:33 22:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 12.1 375 0.7 2.2 4.6 6.3 8.8 9.8 11.4 11.8 10.3 10.9 8.3 5.6 4.5 2.2 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elyse Bierut 0.0% 84.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elyse Bierut 41.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.5
Kimberly Johansen 45.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.8
Shelby Cuddeback 77.2
Coralea Geraniotis 94.6
Kaitlin Snapp 110.1
Brigid Brennan 131.6
Chelsea Smith 167.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.7% 0.7 5
6 2.2% 2.2 6
7 4.6% 4.6 7
8 6.3% 6.3 8
9 8.8% 8.8 9
10 9.8% 9.8 10
11 11.4% 11.4 11
12 11.8% 11.8 12
13 10.3% 10.3 13
14 10.9% 10.9 14
15 8.3% 8.3 15
16 5.6% 5.6 16
17 4.5% 4.5 17
18 2.2% 2.2 18
19 1.4% 1.4 19
20 0.7% 0.7 20
21 0.3% 0.3 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0