Tulane
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
639  Emma Newton SO 21:07
827  Lauren Bartels SO 21:22
1,404  Mikayla Sonneborn SR 22:03
1,744  Katharine Smiley JR 22:25
1,916  Sarah Marvin FR 22:37
2,391  Emily-Kathryn Hoey SO 23:14
2,653  Celeste White JR 23:43
2,721  Madeline Held SO 23:52
2,756  Jennifer LaMori SO 23:57
National Rank #185 of 339
South Central Region Rank #12 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 48.7%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma Newton Lauren Bartels Mikayla Sonneborn Katharine Smiley Sarah Marvin Emily-Kathryn Hoey Celeste White Madeline Held Jennifer LaMori
Paul Short Invitational (Brown) 10/02 1224 21:15 21:11 21:42 22:58 22:25 22:55 23:57
D1 Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/17 1214 21:05 21:13 22:23 22:38 22:32 23:18 23:57
American Athletic Conference Championship 10/31 1241 21:07 21:44 22:08 22:13 23:00 23:33 23:44 23:51 23:59
South Central Region Championships 11/13 1218 21:02 21:35 22:02 21:57 22:41 23:29 23:58





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.2 360 0.0 0.7 9.0 38.9 19.5 12.2 7.7 4.7 2.8 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Newton 0.0% 205.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Newton 35.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.1
Lauren Bartels 45.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5
Mikayla Sonneborn 76.7
Katharine Smiley 93.7
Sarah Marvin 104.2
Emily-Kathryn Hoey 139.2
Celeste White 157.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.7% 0.7 8
9 9.0% 9.0 9
10 38.9% 38.9 10
11 19.5% 19.5 11
12 12.2% 12.2 12
13 7.7% 7.7 13
14 4.7% 4.7 14
15 2.8% 2.8 15
16 2.0% 2.0 16
17 1.4% 1.4 17
18 0.8% 0.8 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.0% 0.0 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0