UL-Monroe
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
3,079  Rebecca Dark SR 25:05
3,179  Colby Carey FR 25:44
3,262  Josie Wood SO 26:23
3,269  Brittany Garrison SR 26:27
3,380  Rebecca Fontenot SR 28:22
3,386  Torri Harrel JR 28:37
3,396  Teona Glave SR 29:08
National Rank #326 of 339
South Central Region Rank #30 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebecca Dark Colby Carey Josie Wood Brittany Garrison Rebecca Fontenot Torri Harrel Teona Glave
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1841 24:57 25:55 26:14 26:28 29:02 28:15
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1852 25:15 26:15 26:46 25:43 28:12 29:21
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/01 1836 25:07 24:37 26:18 27:27 28:09 28:39 29:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.0 963 0.0 96.0 4.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebecca Dark 181.8
Colby Carey 189.1
Josie Wood 195.6
Brittany Garrison 196.4
Rebecca Fontenot 209.2
Torri Harrel 210.5
Teona Glave 213.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 96.0% 96.0 30
31 4.0% 4.0 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0