Brown
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
42  Natalie Schudrowitz SO 19:45
260  Taylor Worthy JR 20:29
352  Carleen Jeffers FR 20:41
435  Lucy Van Kleunen JR 20:49
539  Victoria O'Neil SR 20:58
675  Megan Ratcliffe SO 21:10
690  Emma Sloan FR 21:11
804  Quinn Bornstein SO 21:20
895  Charlotte Walmsley SR 21:27
968  Clare Peabody SO 21:32
1,132  Lucy Srour FR 21:44
1,456  Alexis Van Pernis SO 22:06
1,471  Eliza Lukens-Day JR 22:07
1,818  Cecile Harmange SR 22:30
2,192  Luci Cooke JR 22:57
2,234  Joelle Feinberg SO 23:01
2,245  Jessica Bellows FR 23:02
2,283  Elizabeth Conway JR 23:06
2,553  Szapary Hannah FR 23:30
2,709  Fiona Beltram SO 23:51
National Rank #42 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #6 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 9.8%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.4%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 50.1%
Top 10 in Regional 97.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Natalie Schudrowitz Taylor Worthy Carleen Jeffers Lucy Van Kleunen Victoria O'Neil Megan Ratcliffe Emma Sloan Quinn Bornstein Charlotte Walmsley Clare Peabody Lucy Srour
Coast to Coast Battle in Beantown 09/25 856 20:03 20:42 20:42 20:46 21:13 21:18 21:26 21:51 21:35
NEICAAA Championship 10/10 1198 21:07 21:20 21:23
Brown - Rothenberg Collegiate Meet 10/16 1200 21:20 21:29 21:15 21:49
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 796 19:38 20:30 21:16 20:59 20:58 21:25 20:44
Ivy League Championships 10/30 864 20:24 20:33 20:36 20:45 20:59 21:07 21:22 21:10 21:31 21:50 21:40
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 690 19:41 20:15 20:27 20:51 20:47 20:57 21:21
NCAA Championship 11/21 19:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 9.8% 25.0 595 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.1
Region Championship 100% 5.8 185 0.0 4.3 14.0 15.6 16.1 13.9 11.9 9.5 7.8 4.6 1.5 0.6 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Natalie Schudrowitz 76.9% 46.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.7 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.9
Taylor Worthy 10.0% 143.3
Carleen Jeffers 9.8% 175.5
Lucy Van Kleunen 9.8% 194.0
Victoria O'Neil 9.8% 209.9
Megan Ratcliffe 9.8% 229.1
Emma Sloan 9.8% 231.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Natalie Schudrowitz 5.8 6.4 8.8 8.7 10.0 9.3 8.9 8.5 6.9 5.9 5.4 4.7 3.8 3.2 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Taylor Worthy 27.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.9 3.1 3.4 2.9 4.0 3.6 4.1 3.9 4.3
Carleen Jeffers 38.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.3 2.1 1.9 2.5
Lucy Van Kleunen 48.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.1
Victoria O'Neil 60.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Megan Ratcliffe 79.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Emma Sloan 81.1 0.0 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 4.3% 100.0% 4.3 4.3 2
3 14.0% 27.4% 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 10.2 3.8 3
4 15.6% 7.9% 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 14.4 1.2 4
5 16.1% 1.6% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.3 5
6 13.9% 1.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.2 6
7 11.9% 11.9 7
8 9.5% 9.5 8
9 7.8% 7.8 9
10 4.6% 4.6 10
11 1.5% 1.5 11
12 0.6% 0.6 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 9.8% 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 90.2 4.3 5.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Kansas 26.0% 1.0 0.3
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Harvard 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Penn 1.8% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Boston College 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 2.0 0.0
Bradley 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Michigan 0.2% 1.0 0.0
New Hampshire 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 1.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0