Eastern Michigan
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
159  Jordann McDermitt SO 20:12
195  Alsu Bogdanova JR 20:19
227  Sofie Gallein SR 20:24
579  Jenna Wyns SO 21:01
671  Sydney Meyers FR 21:10
1,010  Amy Frauhammer SR 21:35
1,631  Danielle Benztley SO 22:18
1,899  Claire Mesa SO 22:35
2,124  Lauren Pottschmidt SO 22:52
2,446  Anna Aldrich JR 23:20
National Rank #46 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #6 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.9%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.4%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 17.5%
Top 10 in Regional 97.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jordann McDermitt Alsu Bogdanova Sofie Gallein Jenna Wyns Sydney Meyers Amy Frauhammer Danielle Benztley Claire Mesa Lauren Pottschmidt Anna Aldrich
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/26 928 20:22 20:41 20:26 21:12 21:53 22:28 22:53 24:19 23:39
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/02 899 20:22 20:48 20:10 21:11 21:40 22:31 23:31
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 879 20:10 20:29 20:39 21:01 21:29 22:09 22:49
Mid American Conference Championships 10/31 746 20:07 19:53 20:22 21:14 21:12 22:39 22:29 22:07 22:44
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 743 20:04 19:54 20:26 21:02 21:18 21:45 22:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.9% 25.2 599 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0
Region Championship 100% 6.9 220 0.1 0.5 4.3 12.7 26.5 26.1 15.7 7.9 3.6 1.5 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jordann McDermitt 26.6% 104.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Alsu Bogdanova 14.5% 123.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sofie Gallein 7.5% 135.3 0.0
Jenna Wyns 2.9% 210.5
Sydney Meyers 2.9% 228.4
Amy Frauhammer 2.9% 245.4
Danielle Benztley 3.0% 252.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jordann McDermitt 19.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.8 1.7 2.4 2.4 2.7 3.6 3.6 4.3 3.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 3.8 4.4 3.8 4.5 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.0
Alsu Bogdanova 24.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 3.3 2.8 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.4
Sofie Gallein 28.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.6 3.5 2.8 3.3 3.3 3.1
Jenna Wyns 65.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Sydney Meyers 75.5 0.0
Amy Frauhammer 102.9
Danielle Benztley 150.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 0.5% 65.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 3
4 4.3% 35.5% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2.8 1.5 4
5 12.7% 5.2% 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 12.0 0.7 5
6 26.5% 1.2% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 26.2 0.3 6
7 26.1% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.0 7
8 15.7% 15.7 8
9 7.9% 7.9 9
10 3.6% 3.6 10
11 1.5% 1.5 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 0.4% 0.4 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 2.9% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.2 97.1 0.1 2.9




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
SMU 21.4% 1.0 0.2
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 2.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.9
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 5.0