Pittsburgh
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
366  Gillian Schriever FR 20:42
443  Hillary Boxheimer SR 20:50
570  Melanie Vlasic SO 21:00
689  Deanndra Adams JR 21:11
828  Beth Shenck SO 21:22
834  Ariel Pastore-Sebring SO 21:23
1,031  Abby Peters JR 21:37
1,194  Karli O'Neill JR 21:48
1,254  Miranda Salvo FR 21:53
1,369  Amy Kelly SO 22:01
National Rank #107 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #8 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.3%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.7%
Top 10 in Regional 97.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Gillian Schriever Hillary Boxheimer Melanie Vlasic Deanndra Adams Beth Shenck Ariel Pastore-Sebring Abby Peters Karli O'Neill Miranda Salvo Amy Kelly
Roy Griak Invitational 09/26 1110 20:42 20:51 22:16 22:32 21:45 21:35 21:39 22:56
Carnegie Mellon Invitational 10/10 1223 21:30 21:30 21:50 21:53 21:41
Princeton Invitational 10/17 1029 20:49 21:01 20:41 20:56 21:19 21:32 21:42 21:48 21:52 21:41
ACC Championships 10/30 995 20:41 20:46 21:00 20:47 21:09 21:25 21:38 21:56 22:01 22:13
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/13 985 20:40 20:44 20:52 21:01 21:17 20:58 21:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.3% 29.5 793 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Region Championship 100% 7.6 252 0.1 0.7 2.0 8.1 43.7 26.2 11.7 4.8 1.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gillian Schriever 2.7% 175.5
Hillary Boxheimer 0.9% 190.8
Melanie Vlasic 0.4% 196.0
Deanndra Adams 0.3% 221.5
Beth Shenck 0.3% 234.5
Ariel Pastore-Sebring 0.3% 236.5
Abby Peters 0.3% 249.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gillian Schriever 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.2 3.0
Hillary Boxheimer 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.8
Melanie Vlasic 50.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7
Deanndra Adams 61.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Beth Shenck 70.6 0.0 0.0
Ariel Pastore-Sebring 71.1
Abby Peters 84.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 66.7% 0.0 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.7% 29.4% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.2 4
5 2.0% 1.0% 0.0 2.0 0.0 5
6 8.1% 8.1 6
7 43.7% 43.7 7
8 26.2% 26.2 8
9 11.7% 11.7 9
10 4.8% 4.8 10
11 1.7% 1.7 11
12 0.6% 0.6 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.3% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.7 0.0 0.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0