Portland
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
165  Lauren LaRocco SO 20:13
262  Sanna Mustonen SR 20:29
407  Anna Farello JR 20:46
511  Taryn Rawlings FR 20:56
946  Courtney Cox FR 21:31
1,182  Megan Morgan SR 21:48
1,199  Tori Zellerhoff SR 21:49
1,330  Lindsay Tompkins JR 21:58
1,606  Emily Peterson FR 22:16
1,655  Calli Vanderwilde SR 22:20
National Rank #68 of 339
West Region Rank #11 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 1.6%
Top 10 in Regional 41.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren LaRocco Sanna Mustonen Anna Farello Taryn Rawlings Courtney Cox Megan Morgan Tori Zellerhoff Lindsay Tompkins Emily Peterson Calli Vanderwilde
Washington Invitational 10/02 975 20:21 20:48 20:50 20:58 21:43 21:58 22:28
Charles Bowles Willamette Invitational 10/03 1249 22:40 21:46 21:51
West Coast Conference 10/31 886 20:13 20:21 20:56 20:52 21:32 21:48 21:52 22:01 22:28
West Region Championships 11/13 837 20:07 20:23 20:34 21:00 21:20 21:36 22:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.1 650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 11.1 340 0.1 1.5 3.2 5.4 7.9 10.6 13.0 13.9 13.2 11.8 8.7 5.8 3.2 1.1 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren LaRocco 14.2% 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sanna Mustonen 1.4% 143.0
Anna Farello 0.2% 175.0
Taryn Rawlings 0.1% 186.5
Courtney Cox 0.1% 241.5
Megan Morgan 0.1% 246.5
Tori Zellerhoff 0.1% 243.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren LaRocco 27.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.7
Sanna Mustonen 44.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.4
Anna Farello 63.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Taryn Rawlings 76.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Courtney Cox 125.0
Megan Morgan 151.1
Tori Zellerhoff 152.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.1% 75.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4
5 1.5% 5.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 5
6 3.2% 3.2 6
7 5.4% 5.4 7
8 7.9% 7.9 8
9 10.6% 10.6 9
10 13.0% 13.0 10
11 13.9% 13.9 11
12 13.2% 13.2 12
13 11.8% 11.8 13
14 8.7% 8.7 14
15 5.8% 5.8 15
16 3.2% 3.2 16
17 1.1% 1.1 17
18 0.4% 0.4 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0