Samford
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
567  Karisa Nelson SO 21:00
1,006  Emma Garner SO 21:35
1,548  Ansley Bos JR 22:13
2,447  Katelyn Brock SR 23:20
2,773  Magaret Grogan SR 24:00
2,866  Natalie Johnston FR 24:16
National Rank #244 of 339
South Region Rank #30 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.2%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Karisa Nelson Emma Garner Ansley Bos Katelyn Brock Magaret Grogan Natalie Johnston
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1327 20:52 22:05 23:07 24:01 24:21
Southern Conference Championship 10/31 1308 21:14 21:34 22:22 23:38 24:00 24:12
South Region Championships 11/13 21:15 22:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.6 762 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.7 3.9 8.4 14.7 18.7 19.6 15.1 9.6 5.0 1.7



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karisa Nelson 0.0% 177.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karisa Nelson 59.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
Emma Garner 97.5
Ansley Bos 145.1
Katelyn Brock 218.2
Magaret Grogan 242.0
Natalie Johnston 247.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 0.8% 0.8 21
22 1.7% 1.7 22
23 3.9% 3.9 23
24 8.4% 8.4 24
25 14.7% 14.7 25
26 18.7% 18.7 26
27 19.6% 19.6 27
28 15.1% 15.1 28
29 9.6% 9.6 29
30 5.0% 5.0 30
31 1.7% 1.7 31
32 0.6% 0.6 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 0.0% 0.0 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0