Troy
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,629  Sarah Zylstra SO 22:18
1,750  Samantha Smith JR 22:25
1,912  Julia Ostendorf SR 22:37
2,008  Mikayla Hodges JR 22:43
2,729  Katrina Bokenfohr JR 23:54
3,049  Kristina Bokenfohr JR 24:57
3,082  Naomi Sheppard SO 25:06
3,101  Keaton Wallace SO 25:12
3,178  Krystin Guirey FR 25:44
3,261  Rae Leach JR 26:23
National Rank #260 of 339
South Region Rank #31 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sarah Zylstra Samantha Smith Julia Ostendorf Mikayla Hodges Katrina Bokenfohr Kristina Bokenfohr Naomi Sheppard Keaton Wallace Krystin Guirey Rae Leach
JSU Foothills Invitational 10/03 1449 22:15 22:45 23:41 24:56 24:54 25:41
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1340 22:15 22:37 22:20 22:49 24:40 24:59 24:58 25:15 25:46 27:11
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/01 1312 22:31 22:15 22:50 22:38 23:42 25:40 25:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.7 915 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 2.1 4.1 7.8 14.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Zylstra 153.2
Samantha Smith 163.5
Julia Ostendorf 177.3
Mikayla Hodges 184.6
Katrina Bokenfohr 239.6
Kristina Bokenfohr 263.1
Naomi Sheppard 266.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.5% 0.5 26
27 0.8% 0.8 27
28 2.1% 2.1 28
29 4.1% 4.1 29
30 7.8% 7.8 30
31 14.0% 14.0 31
32 16.8% 16.8 32
33 17.2% 17.2 33
34 14.8% 14.8 34
35 10.0% 10.0 35
36 6.5% 6.5 36
37 4.3% 4.3 37
38 0.7% 0.7 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0