West Virginia
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
138  Millie Paladino SO 20:09
306  Maggie Drazba SO 20:36
374  Amy Cashin SO 20:43
388  Brynn Harshbarger SO 20:44
448  Savanna Plombon SR 20:50
484  Anna French FR 20:53
578  Brianna Kerekes JR 21:01
663  Kelly Williams SR 21:09
1,551  Corinne Kule SO 22:13
1,568  Rachel Faulds SO 22:14
1,780  Allie Diehl SO 22:27
National Rank #50 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #6 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 25.6%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.5%


Regional Champion 0.6%
Top 5 in Regional 71.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Millie Paladino Maggie Drazba Amy Cashin Brynn Harshbarger Savanna Plombon Anna French Brianna Kerekes Kelly Williams Corinne Kule Rachel Faulds Allie Diehl
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/03 1061 20:38 21:02 21:18 21:16 21:10 22:27 21:55 22:23
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 860 20:41 20:36 20:43 20:26 20:49 21:00 21:24
Penn State Nationals 10/17 22:08 22:34
Big 12 Championships 10/31 818 20:28 20:26 20:40 20:33 20:57 20:48 21:02 20:59 22:10 22:34
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/13 783 20:07 20:49 20:35 20:48 20:25 20:57 21:09
NCAA Championship 11/21 19:56





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 25.6% 27.1 658 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.8 3.5 3.9 4.8 2.3
Region Championship 100% 4.7 147 0.6 3.2 10.5 27.8 29.0 23.9 4.4 0.5 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Millie Paladino 61.7% 106.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Maggie Drazba 26.4% 170.8
Amy Cashin 25.7% 188.0
Brynn Harshbarger 25.7% 190.8
Savanna Plombon 25.6% 203.4
Anna French 25.6% 210.9
Brianna Kerekes 25.6% 222.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Millie Paladino 11.5 1.0 1.9 2.9 3.5 3.8 4.7 5.1 5.5 6.8 6.7 5.1 5.7 5.5 5.6 5.2 4.8 4.4 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.4 0.9
Maggie Drazba 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.7 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.9
Amy Cashin 33.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.1
Brynn Harshbarger 34.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5
Savanna Plombon 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.8 1.6
Anna French 43.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2
Brianna Kerekes 52.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.6% 100.0% 0.6 0.6 1
2 3.2% 100.0% 3.2 3.2 2
3 10.5% 79.5% 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 2.1 8.3 3
4 27.8% 36.5% 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.9 2.3 1.2 17.7 10.2 4
5 29.0% 9.2% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.9 26.4 2.7 5
6 23.9% 2.5% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 23.3 0.6 6
7 4.4% 4.4 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 25.6% 0.6 3.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.7 2.0 3.0 2.9 3.5 2.7 74.4 3.8 21.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Kansas 26.0% 1.0 0.3
SMU 21.4% 1.0 0.2
Baylor 11.7% 2.0 0.2
Tulsa 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Boston College 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0