Texas A&M-CC
Men
-
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
1,529 |
Morgan McCutchen |
FR |
22:05 |
1,597 |
Cynthia Quiroga |
SO |
22:08 |
1,630 |
Liz Romo |
JR |
22:10 |
2,296 |
carrisa pinon |
JR |
22:54 |
2,415 |
Rebekah Hardee |
FR |
23:02 |
2,892 |
Linda Garcia |
SO |
23:57 |
3,007 |
Naila Flores |
FR |
24:15 |
3,529 |
Brandie Garcia |
JR |
27:36 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
95.4% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Morgan McCutchen |
Cynthia Quiroga |
Liz Romo |
carrisa pinon |
Rebekah Hardee |
Linda Garcia |
Naila Flores |
Brandie Garcia |
Islander Splash |
09/16 |
1278 |
22:15 |
21:37 |
22:18 |
22:30 |
|
23:44 |
23:34 |
27:23 |
Texas A&M Invitational |
09/24 |
1283 |
22:13 |
21:44 |
21:56 |
23:06 |
|
|
23:55 |
|
Southland Conference Championships |
10/28 |
1287 |
21:57 |
22:04 |
21:52 |
23:16 |
22:55 |
24:38 |
25:14 |
27:33 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/11 |
1297 |
22:03 |
22:17 |
22:45 |
22:45 |
23:13 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
17.2 |
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
3.3 |
9.0 |
23.4 |
22.1 |
15.8 |
11.9 |
8.3 |
3.6 |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Morgan McCutchen |
78.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia Quiroga |
80.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liz Romo |
82.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrisa pinon |
118.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebekah Hardee |
125.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Garcia |
162.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naila Flores |
170.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
1.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
9.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
23.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
22.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
15.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
11.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
8.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |