Creighton
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
503  Emily Martin SO 20:56
957  Maddie Ivy SR 21:29
1,017  Megan Paule SO 21:32
1,127  Vanessa Miller SR 21:40
1,267  Grace Mimmack JR 21:48
1,913  Adriana Kammerer SO 22:28
2,350  Maile Shigemasa JR 22:57
2,475  Ashlyn Glann JR 23:08
2,493  Michaela Brands FR 23:09
2,939  Haley Fye FR 24:04
National Rank #157 of 344
Midwest Region Rank #20 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.9%
Top 20 in Regional 62.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emily Martin Maddie Ivy Megan Paule Vanessa Miller Grace Mimmack Adriana Kammerer Maile Shigemasa Ashlyn Glann Michaela Brands Haley Fye
Commadore Classic 09/17 1158 21:01 21:11 21:05 21:56 21:39 22:57 23:30 23:45
Chile Pepper Festival 10/01 1159 20:49 21:25 21:18 21:31 22:38 23:05
Bradley "Pink" Classic 10/14 1169 20:43 21:47 21:51 21:44 21:45 22:42 23:02 22:22 22:56 24:26
Big East Conference Championships 10/28 1216 20:54 21:34 21:54 22:17 23:02 23:35
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 1216 21:06 21:35 22:15 21:44 22:20 23:13 23:31





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.0 521 0.2 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.9 3.9 5.9 5.2 8.0 9.1 10.8 11.4 10.6 11.1 8.0 5.6 1.5 0.9 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Martin 0.0% 181.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Martin 52.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.9
Maddie Ivy 102.2
Megan Paule 108.7
Vanessa Miller 119.5
Grace Mimmack 133.5
Adriana Kammerer 186.0
Maile Shigemasa 215.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.7% 0.7 9
10 1.0% 1.0 10
11 1.4% 1.4 11
12 2.3% 2.3 12
13 2.9% 2.9 13
14 3.9% 3.9 14
15 5.9% 5.9 15
16 5.2% 5.2 16
17 8.0% 8.0 17
18 9.1% 9.1 18
19 10.8% 10.8 19
20 11.4% 11.4 20
21 10.6% 10.6 21
22 11.1% 11.1 22
23 8.0% 8.0 23
24 5.6% 5.6 24
25 1.5% 1.5 25
26 0.9% 0.9 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0