Dartmouth
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
254  Helen Schlachtenhaufen SR 20:27
287  Olivia Lantz SO 20:32
342  Diana Vizza FR 20:39
463  Leigh Moffett JR 20:52
519  Georgia Fear FR 20:58
696  O'Neil Bridget SO 21:12
741  Lillian Anderson SO 21:15
780  Bridget O'Neill JR 21:17
868  Eliza Dekker SO 21:23
1,016  Bridget Flynn JR 21:32
1,055  Lauren Sapone FR 21:35
1,071  Julia Stevenson FR 21:36
1,245  Abby Livingston JR 21:47
National Rank #64 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #7 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 3.3%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.1%
Top 5 in Regional 41.1%
Top 10 in Regional 97.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Helen Schlachtenhaufen Olivia Lantz Diana Vizza Leigh Moffett Georgia Fear O'Neil Bridget Lillian Anderson Bridget O'Neill Eliza Dekker Bridget Flynn Lauren Sapone
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/16 881 21:05 20:40 20:27 20:34 21:00 21:23 21:38 20:50 20:54
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 838 20:24 20:25 20:38 20:41 21:10 21:02 21:48 21:34
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1174 20:54 21:29 21:25
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 919 20:23 20:29 20:54 21:02 20:59 21:31 21:15
Ivy League Championship 10/29 895 20:25 20:29 20:37 21:00 21:06 21:28 21:18 21:10 22:02 24:25
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 799 20:09 20:22 20:38 20:37 21:34 21:12 21:16





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 3.3% 28.3 671 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.6
Region Championship 100% 6.1 197 0.1 0.8 5.1 15.6 19.7 19.8 18.3 10.5 4.8 2.7 1.7 0.8 0.5 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Helen Schlachtenhaufen 8.7% 141.0
Olivia Lantz 5.5% 142.3
Diana Vizza 3.9% 180.3
Leigh Moffett 3.3% 199.8
Georgia Fear 3.3% 212.8
O'Neil Bridget 3.3% 229.3
Lillian Anderson 3.3% 231.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Helen Schlachtenhaufen 23.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.4 1.7 1.9 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.2 4.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4
Olivia Lantz 28.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.3 3.7 2.9 3.9 2.9
Diana Vizza 35.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.1 0.6 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.7
Leigh Moffett 48.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6
Georgia Fear 55.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2
O'Neil Bridget 76.3 0.1 0.1
Lillian Anderson 79.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 1
2 0.8% 100.0% 0.8 0.8 2
3 5.1% 47.5% 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.7 2.4 3
4 15.6% 0.3% 0.1 15.6 0.1 4
5 19.7% 19.7 5
6 19.8% 19.8 6
7 18.3% 18.3 7
8 10.5% 10.5 8
9 4.8% 4.8 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 1.7% 1.7 11
12 0.8% 0.8 12
13 0.5% 0.5 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 3.3% 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 96.8 0.8 2.5




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Louisville 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Brown 0.6% 2.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Iona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0