Evansville
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,556  Sienna Crews SO 22:06
1,580  Hannah Welsh FR 22:08
2,722  Michelle Karp JR 23:33
2,787  Ashton Bosler SO 23:41
2,992  Kylie Hasenour FR 24:13
3,232  Anna Loef SR 25:02
3,346  Katie Beaber SR 25:40
3,454  August Martinez FR 26:38
3,499  Hayley Elliot SO 27:00
National Rank #281 of 344
Great Lakes Region Rank #32 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sienna Crews Hannah Welsh Michelle Karp Ashton Bosler Kylie Hasenour Anna Loef Katie Beaber August Martinez Hayley Elliot
Indiana Intercollegiate Championships 09/16 1364 21:41 24:11 23:28 23:35 25:19 27:03 26:53 29:20
Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/01 1366 22:00 22:02 23:58 23:24 23:42 24:56 25:21 26:50 27:18
UE Invitational 10/15 1432 23:36 23:36 23:39 23:39 23:42 23:42 23:45 23:45 23:46
Missouri Valley Conference 10/29 1391 22:04 21:42 23:24 23:41 24:56 25:02 25:32 27:03
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/11 1393 22:19 22:25 23:15 24:00 25:07 24:36 25:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.5 960 0.1 0.4 4.3 14.5 24.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sienna Crews 150.8
Hannah Welsh 153.1
Michelle Karp 214.9
Ashton Bosler 217.0
Kylie Hasenour 225.0
Anna Loef 232.1
Katie Beaber 236.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 4.3% 4.3 29
30 14.5% 14.5 30
31 24.8% 24.8 31
32 38.4% 38.4 32
33 13.4% 13.4 33
34 4.4% 4.4 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0