McNeese State
Men
-
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
508 |
Katja Woelfl |
JR |
20:57 |
1,784 |
Alison Smegal |
SR |
22:19 |
1,811 |
Shannon Mclellan |
JR |
22:21 |
2,558 |
Imogen Hull |
FR |
23:15 |
2,831 |
Lauren Hawtin |
JR |
23:48 |
2,873 |
Estela Pina |
FR |
23:54 |
3,367 |
Celeste Cordova |
FR |
25:47 |
3,501 |
Sara Lamdendola |
FR |
27:02 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
90.9% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Katja Woelfl |
Alison Smegal |
Shannon Mclellan |
Imogen Hull |
Lauren Hawtin |
Estela Pina |
Celeste Cordova |
Sara Lamdendola |
Texas A&M Invitational |
09/24 |
|
20:59 |
22:53 |
22:10 |
|
|
24:26 |
|
|
McNeese State Cowboy Stampede |
10/01 |
1285 |
21:00 |
22:18 |
22:45 |
23:03 |
23:41 |
23:51 |
25:40 |
|
Princeton Invitational |
10/15 |
1284 |
21:07 |
22:00 |
22:14 |
23:16 |
23:29 |
23:49 |
|
|
Southland Conference Championships |
10/28 |
1337 |
21:05 |
22:05 |
22:23 |
|
24:30 |
24:03 |
25:54 |
27:02 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/11 |
1240 |
20:41 |
21:58 |
22:26 |
23:25 |
23:51 |
23:31 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
18.2 |
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
3.3 |
10.3 |
17.8 |
22.8 |
20.4 |
14.8 |
6.6 |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Katja Woelfl |
0.1% |
187.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Katja Woelfl |
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
Alison Smegal |
90.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shannon Mclellan |
92.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imogen Hull |
136.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren Hawtin |
158.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estela Pina |
161.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celeste Cordova |
195.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
10.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
17.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
22.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
20.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
14.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
6.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |