Memphis
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
93  Martina Rodriguez SR 20:01
335  Chelsea Ladd JR 20:38
725  Arnica Zitting JR 21:14
1,105  Bailey Kennemer SO 21:39
1,689  Megan Briley JR 22:14
2,035  Mary Minkler JR 22:35
2,101  Paige Sandwell FR 22:40
2,289  Lauren Wheeler JR 22:54
2,510  Abigail Tankersley SR 23:11
2,516  Gabrielle Byndas FR 23:11
2,586  Megan Christensen JR 23:18
3,073  Emily Churchwill FR 24:26
National Rank #84 of 344
South Region Rank #9 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.3%
Top 10 in Regional 41.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Martina Rodriguez Chelsea Ladd Arnica Zitting Bailey Kennemer Megan Briley Mary Minkler Paige Sandwell Lauren Wheeler Abigail Tankersley Gabrielle Byndas Megan Christensen
Rhodes Invitational 09/17 1124 20:39 20:58 21:27 21:48 23:49 22:32 22:49 23:04 23:39 22:34 23:10
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 943 19:47 20:39 21:22 21:18 22:14 22:38 22:50 22:54
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 902 19:48 20:33 20:58 21:12 22:10 22:08 22:23 22:48 23:28 23:41 24:08
American Conference Championship 10/29 831 19:56 20:03 20:50 21:20 22:06 22:33 22:34 22:40 23:47
South Region Championships 11/11 939 19:56 20:22 21:36 21:51 21:55 23:15 22:44





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.1 351 0.3 0.8 1.5 6.1 11.9 20.5 21.1 14.1 11.2 5.8 3.4 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Martina Rodriguez 37.3% 76.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2
Chelsea Ladd 0.1% 159.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Martina Rodriguez 7.1 3.5 6.8 7.6 8.0 7.9 8.4 7.6 6.5 6.7 5.4 4.8 4.6 3.7 3.4 2.2 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.8
Chelsea Ladd 30.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 2.0 1.7 2.3 3.0 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7
Arnica Zitting 68.8 0.1 0.1 0.1
Bailey Kennemer 100.8
Megan Briley 139.8
Mary Minkler 169.7
Paige Sandwell 177.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.3% 0.3 5
6 0.8% 0.8 6
7 1.5% 1.5 7
8 6.1% 6.1 8
9 11.9% 11.9 9
10 20.5% 20.5 10
11 21.1% 21.1 11
12 14.1% 14.1 12
13 11.2% 11.2 13
14 5.8% 5.8 14
15 3.4% 3.4 15
16 1.9% 1.9 16
17 0.9% 0.9 17
18 0.5% 0.5 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0