Mercer
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,081  Anna Grzeszczak FR 22:38
2,304  Victoria Rogers SR 22:54
2,512  McKaylin Darsey FR 23:11
2,545  Courtney Czerniak JR 23:14
2,599  Kimberly Whiting FR 23:19
2,821  Bethanie Bailey SO 23:46
2,951  Shannon Millikin SR 24:06
3,183  Brianna Wahy SR 24:49
3,218  Sarah Ellen Powell FR 24:58
3,352  Julia Turbyfield FR 25:41
National Rank #274 of 344
South Region Rank #34 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Anna Grzeszczak Victoria Rogers McKaylin Darsey Courtney Czerniak Kimberly Whiting Bethanie Bailey Shannon Millikin Brianna Wahy Sarah Ellen Powell Julia Turbyfield
Mercer Julius Johnson Invitational 09/23 1345 23:30 22:33 23:05 22:52 23:17 24:12 25:40 25:09
JSU Foothills Invitational 10/01 1393 22:37 23:08 23:23 24:04 23:49 23:54 24:03 24:59 24:57 25:49
Berry Invitational 10/15 1349 22:32 22:55 23:06 22:54 23:59 24:12 24:19 24:31 25:05 25:29
Southern Conference Championship 10/29 1337 22:39 22:43 23:24 23:09 23:03 23:53 24:08 24:35 24:48
South Region Championships 11/11 1312 22:29 22:43 22:53 23:10 22:53 23:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.7 1019 0.1 0.5 1.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Grzeszczak 174.5
Victoria Rogers 196.5
McKaylin Darsey 214.8
Courtney Czerniak 216.9
Kimberly Whiting 221.4
Bethanie Bailey 240.0
Shannon Millikin 251.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 0.5% 0.5 30
31 1.4% 1.4 31
32 4.6% 4.6 32
33 13.4% 13.4 33
34 26.4% 26.4 34
35 23.7% 23.7 35
36 15.7% 15.7 36
37 9.8% 9.8 37
38 3.9% 3.9 38
39 0.6% 0.6 39
40 0.1% 0.1 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0