Ohio State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
149  Sarah Kanney SO 20:10
196  Emily Stoodley SO 20:18
280  Christine Frederick JR 20:31
312  Lilly Saniel-Banrey SO 20:35
409  Abby Nichols FR 20:46
493  Rachel Lehnhart SO 20:56
551  Jessica Passwater SO 21:01
567  Brittany Atkinson SO 21:02
581  Lainey Studebaker FR 21:04
590  Rachel Weber SR 21:04
604  Devon Leahy FR 21:06
1,047  Claire Wiles SO 21:35
National Rank #40 of 344
Great Lakes Region Rank #6 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 10.4%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 2.7%


Regional Champion 0.3%
Top 5 in Regional 23.5%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Sarah Kanney Emily Stoodley Christine Frederick Lilly Saniel-Banrey Abby Nichols Rachel Lehnhart Jessica Passwater Brittany Atkinson Lainey Studebaker Rachel Weber Devon Leahy
Commadore Classic 09/17 695 20:16 20:18 20:23 20:33 20:44 20:50 20:56 20:33 20:51 20:58
Roy Griak Invitational 09/24 639 20:19 19:55 20:12 20:54 20:52 20:27 21:19 20:52
All Ohio Championships 09/30 1173 21:09 20:55
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 21:15
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 848 20:11 20:30 21:09 20:53 20:59 20:50 20:48
Big 10 Championship 10/30 593 19:50 19:56 20:18 20:36 20:43 21:14 21:07 21:01 21:33
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/11 749 20:11 20:23 20:18 20:55 20:46 21:45 21:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 10.4% 23.7 567 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1
Region Championship 100% 6.4 183 0.3 1.0 2.8 5.4 14.1 34.3 20.1 13.4 7.7 1.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Kanney 24.0% 99.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Emily Stoodley 14.4% 116.3 0.1
Christine Frederick 10.9% 156.8
Lilly Saniel-Banrey 10.6% 170.8
Abby Nichols 10.4% 198.2
Rachel Lehnhart 10.4% 213.3
Jessica Passwater 10.4% 218.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Kanney 20.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.1 1.6 3.2 3.1 3.2 2.7 3.1 4.3 3.8 4.4 4.4 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.1
Emily Stoodley 27.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.7 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.7 2.7 3.1 3.7
Christine Frederick 38.8 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.5 2.3
Lilly Saniel-Banrey 42.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.5
Abby Nichols 52.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3
Rachel Lehnhart 62.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Jessica Passwater 67.8 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 1
2 1.0% 100.0% 1.0 1.0 2
3 2.8% 76.8% 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 2.2 3
4 5.4% 49.5% 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 2.7 2.7 4
5 14.1% 14.9% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.3 12.0 2.1 5
6 34.3% 4.7% 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 32.7 1.6 6
7 20.1% 2.2% 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 19.7 0.5 7
8 13.4% 1.1% 0.1 0.1 13.2 0.2 8
9 7.7% 7.7 9
10 1.1% 1.1 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 10.4% 0.3 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.2 89.7 1.3 9.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Miss State 82.8% 1.0 0.8
Furman 25.1% 2.0 0.5
Missouri 24.4% 1.0 0.2
Eastern Kentucky 12.1% 1.0 0.1
Louisville 9.3% 2.0 0.2
Vanderbilt 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Duke 3.2% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 2.1% 2.0 0.0
Butler 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 1.0% 2.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Northern Illinois 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 7.0