Quinnipiac
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
448  Niamh Ashe SR 20:50
572  Kaleigh Roberts JR 21:03
574  Emily Wolff JR 21:03
969  Kaitlin Bakas FR 21:30
1,613  Kathryn Veron JR 22:09
2,082  Ellie Songer FR 22:38
2,093  Cameron Chaplen SR 22:39
2,192  Amy Laverty FR 22:46
2,213  Sara Wilcox FR 22:47
2,337  Medinah Nabadduka SR 22:56
2,374  Maria Ricalton SO 22:59
2,413  Harmony Grodsky JR 23:02
2,668  Marykate O'Meara JR 23:27
2,906  Kaitlyn Hebert SO 23:58
National Rank #122 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #14 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 2.5%
Top 20 in Regional 99.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Niamh Ashe Kaleigh Roberts Emily Wolff Kaitlin Bakas Kathryn Veron Ellie Songer Cameron Chaplen Amy Laverty Sara Wilcox Medinah Nabadduka Maria Ricalton
Iona Br. Paddy Doyle Meet of Champions 09/16 1180 21:03 20:57 21:48 21:59 23:02 23:17 22:33 23:30 22:18 23:46
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 1143 20:47 20:56 21:30 22:17 22:22 22:50 22:42 23:32
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1258 22:25 22:44 22:46
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 22:46
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 1179 20:59 21:21 21:28 21:29 22:15 23:29 22:57
MAAC Championship 10/29 1089 20:52 20:50 21:05 21:08 22:11 21:54 22:24 22:54 22:26 23:16 22:42
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 1136 20:46 21:12 21:09 21:36 22:01 22:41 23:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.6 446 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.9 2.9 7.0 14.4 27.6 19.1 11.6 6.5 4.2 1.9 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Niamh Ashe 0.1% 196.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Niamh Ashe 46.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.2
Kaleigh Roberts 62.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2
Emily Wolff 63.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3
Kaitlin Bakas 102.0
Kathryn Veron 166.8
Ellie Songer 210.6
Cameron Chaplen 212.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 1.9% 1.9 10
11 2.9% 2.9 11
12 7.0% 7.0 12
13 14.4% 14.4 13
14 27.6% 27.6 14
15 19.1% 19.1 15
16 11.6% 11.6 16
17 6.5% 6.5 17
18 4.2% 4.2 18
19 1.9% 1.9 19
20 1.7% 1.7 20
21 0.5% 0.5 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0