Seattle U.
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
877  Lila Rice SR 21:24
1,092  Johanna Erickson JR 21:38
1,100  Olivia Stein SO 21:39
1,327  Moira O'Connor Lenth SR 21:52
1,501  Anastasia Honea FR 22:03
1,564  Rebecca Lassere SR 22:07
2,063  Shannan Higgins FR 22:37
2,576  Thea Foulk FR 23:17
2,705  Siobhan Rubio FR 23:31
National Rank #182 of 344
West Region Rank #28 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 12.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lila Rice Johanna Erickson Olivia Stein Moira O'Connor Lenth Anastasia Honea Rebecca Lassere Shannan Higgins Thea Foulk Siobhan Rubio
Sundodger Invitational 09/17 1236 21:35 21:48 21:41 22:03 22:24 22:01 22:35 22:51
UW Invitational 10/01 1239 22:38 21:39 21:34 21:38 23:23 22:17
WAC Championship 10/29 1196 21:00 21:28 21:44 21:50 22:51 21:58 22:33 23:43 23:30
West Region Championships 11/11 1207 21:16 21:20 21:47 22:05 21:36 22:31 23:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.2 699 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.7 1.3 2.1 3.2 4.4 5.7 7.9 10.2 12.1 15.7 15.0 11.1 5.7 2.8 1.3 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lila Rice 113.7
Johanna Erickson 132.7
Olivia Stein 134.9
Moira O'Connor Lenth 153.8
Anastasia Honea 169.7
Rebecca Lassere 175.0
Shannan Higgins 206.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.7% 0.7 15
16 0.7% 0.7 16
17 1.3% 1.3 17
18 2.1% 2.1 18
19 3.2% 3.2 19
20 4.4% 4.4 20
21 5.7% 5.7 21
22 7.9% 7.9 22
23 10.2% 10.2 23
24 12.1% 12.1 24
25 15.7% 15.7 25
26 15.0% 15.0 26
27 11.1% 11.1 27
28 5.7% 5.7 28
29 2.8% 2.8 29
30 1.3% 1.3 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0