Tulane
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
466  Emma Newton JR 20:52
523  Lauren Bartels JR 20:58
1,405  Mckenzie Melius FR 21:57
1,757  Sarah Cella FR 22:18
2,154  Jennifer LaMori JR 22:43
2,461  Jessica Adamson SR 23:06
2,480  Mary Catherine Stovall FR 23:08
2,749  Paige Fatland FR 23:36
2,771  Erika Chelales JR 23:38
2,920  Aislinn Roberts FR 24:00
National Rank #148 of 344
South Central Region Rank #9 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 58.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma Newton Lauren Bartels Mckenzie Melius Sarah Cella Jennifer LaMori Jessica Adamson Mary Catherine Stovall Paige Fatland Erika Chelales Aislinn Roberts
Allstate Sugar Bowl Festival 09/10 1326 22:27 22:42 23:09 22:58 24:13 23:34 23:19
LSU Invitational 09/17 1158 20:49 20:57 21:42 22:03 22:40 24:54 23:14 23:48
Stanford Invitational 10/01 1217 20:55 21:10 22:12 22:07 23:59 23:36 23:26 24:06
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 1138 20:51 20:45 21:50 22:27 23:05 22:29 23:58
American Conference Championship 10/29 1208 20:59 21:05 21:51 22:19 23:10 23:27 23:30 23:57 24:27
South Central Region Championships 11/11 1124 20:43 20:47 21:57 22:31 22:16 23:20 23:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.5 341 0.2 3.3 27.4 28.0 18.6 11.3 6.8 2.9 1.3 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Newton 0.5% 211.0
Lauren Bartels 0.1% 196.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Newton 31.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 2.0 3.0 3.3 3.7 4.8
Lauren Bartels 34.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.6 1.7 1.8 3.2
Mckenzie Melius 71.9
Sarah Cella 89.4
Jennifer LaMori 109.7
Jessica Adamson 129.7
Mary Catherine Stovall 131.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.2% 0.2 7
8 3.3% 3.3 8
9 27.4% 27.4 9
10 28.0% 28.0 10
11 18.6% 18.6 11
12 11.3% 11.3 12
13 6.8% 6.8 13
14 2.9% 2.9 14
15 1.3% 1.3 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0