UAB
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
577  Rebecca Evans JR 21:03
813  Sarah Livett SR 21:19
1,291  Emily Drouin JR 21:50
1,756  Hannah Coffin SR 22:18
2,107  Jenna Hinds FR 22:40
2,315  Serena Martinez FR 22:55
2,852  Marielle Lewis FR 23:51
3,250  Chloe Peek JR 25:07
National Rank #172 of 344
South Region Rank #21 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 50.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebecca Evans Sarah Livett Emily Drouin Hannah Coffin Jenna Hinds Serena Martinez Marielle Lewis Chloe Peek
Commadore Classic 09/17 1197 21:02 21:30 21:36 21:53 22:25 22:30 23:30
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 1202 20:59 21:25 21:42 22:23 22:53 23:56
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1259 21:19 21:12 22:04 22:44 23:42 24:04 25:08
Conference USA Championship 10/29 1182 20:52 21:06 21:43 22:26 22:44 22:47
South Region Championships 11/11 1215 20:57 21:17 21:59 22:29 23:20 23:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.3 572 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.9 5.6 7.7 12.1 19.0 25.2 11.9 6.0 3.6 1.7 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebecca Evans 55.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2
Sarah Livett 75.6 0.1 0.1
Emily Drouin 112.9
Hannah Coffin 147.4
Jenna Hinds 178.3
Serena Martinez 197.7
Marielle Lewis 243.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 0.8% 0.8 14
15 1.7% 1.7 15
16 2.9% 2.9 16
17 5.6% 5.6 17
18 7.7% 7.7 18
19 12.1% 12.1 19
20 19.0% 19.0 20
21 25.2% 25.2 21
22 11.9% 11.9 22
23 6.0% 6.0 23
24 3.6% 3.6 24
25 1.7% 1.7 25
26 0.8% 0.8 26
27 0.7% 0.7 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0