Miss State
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
128  Shannon Fair JR 20:03
222  Lisa Oed FR 20:19
443  Stephanie Peterson SO 20:46
720  Kristy Terp JR 21:09
1,058  Emma Tucker SO 21:32
1,422  Audrey Honiotes FR 21:55
1,457  Katherine Badham FR 21:57
1,850  Alex Wallace SO 22:23
2,107  Carly Terp JR 22:39
2,666  Alyssa Staubach JR 23:35
2,744  Charlotte Cayton-Smith FR 23:44
National Rank #67 of 348
South Region Rank #6 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.7%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 24.2%
Top 10 in Regional 98.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Shannon Fair Lisa Oed Stephanie Peterson Kristy Terp Emma Tucker Audrey Honiotes Katherine Badham Alex Wallace Carly Terp Alyssa Staubach Charlotte Cayton-Smith
Falcon Classic 09/16 918 20:03 20:25 20:58 21:41 21:37 21:29 22:17 23:07
Paul Short Gold 09/29 866 19:51 20:38 20:36 21:16 21:23 22:04 22:01 22:43
Crimson Classic 10/13 799 20:12 20:17 20:14 21:09 21:24 21:49 22:14 22:00 22:26 23:36 24:29
SEC Championship 10/27 752 19:50 19:53 20:52 20:50 21:26 22:03 22:38 22:58
South Region Championships 11/10 920 20:07 20:26 20:57 21:09 21:49 22:06 21:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.7% 28.1 677 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
Region Championship 100% 6.9 226 0.4 3.4 7.3 13.2 17.5 19.3 17.7 16.4 3.4 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Shannon Fair 51.2% 104.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Lisa Oed 14.3% 135.8
Stephanie Peterson 0.8% 191.5
Kristy Terp 0.7% 230.0
Emma Tucker 0.7% 243.0
Audrey Honiotes 0.7% 249.0
Katherine Badham 0.7% 251.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Shannon Fair 7.5 2.1 3.4 6.4 8.0 9.4 8.7 8.8 6.6 6.9 6.3 5.2 4.6 4.2 3.7 2.7 2.1 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.3
Lisa Oed 14.9 0.2 0.5 1.6 2.3 3.3 4.1 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.2 4.9 5.6 5.2 4.8 4.3 5.1 4.2 3.4 2.8 3.2 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.3
Stephanie Peterson 37.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.6 1.6 2.2 2.2 1.4
Kristy Terp 64.8 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Emma Tucker 95.2
Audrey Honiotes 125.0
Katherine Badham 126.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.4% 100.0% 0.4 0.4 2
3 3.4% 1.5% 0.1 3.3 0.1 3
4 7.3% 2.1% 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.2 0.2 4
5 13.2% 0.8% 0.1 0.1 13.1 0.1 5
6 17.5% 0.3% 0.1 17.5 0.1 6
7 19.3% 19.3 7
8 17.7% 17.7 8
9 16.4% 16.4 9
10 3.4% 3.4 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 0.4% 0.4 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.7% 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 99.3 0.4 0.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Samford 10.8% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 2.7% 1.0 0.0
Wake Forest 2.5% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0