Pepperdine
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,434  Abbey Meck FR 21:56
2,146  Lindsay Sanger FR 22:43
2,504  Caroline Archer FR 23:16
2,593  Amanda Stahl FR 23:25
2,738  Emma Battin FR 23:43
2,784  Cassidy Aberson FR 23:52
2,829  Tatum Rask SO 24:01
2,925  Bela Garcia-Arce SO 24:20
3,072  Taleah Phillips FR 24:52
3,124  Kaitlyn Davenport FR 25:17
3,136  Karina Crowley FR 25:23
3,236  Grace Palmer FR 26:12
National Rank #279 of 348
West Region Rank #39 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 39th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Abbey Meck Lindsay Sanger Caroline Archer Amanda Stahl Emma Battin Cassidy Aberson Tatum Rask Bela Garcia-Arce Taleah Phillips Kaitlyn Davenport Karina Crowley
UCR Invitational 09/16 1365 22:01 23:12 23:21 23:25 23:33 24:25 24:57 25:01
UCR Highlander Invitational 10/14 1337 21:52 22:45 23:18 22:57 24:55 23:39 23:54 24:29 24:45 25:28 25:24
West Coast Conference 10/27 1344 21:55 22:32 22:58 24:01 23:29 24:01 24:09 23:53 24:58
West Region Championships 11/10 1367 22:00 22:34 23:35 23:32 24:28 23:54 24:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 38.4 1100 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbey Meck 158.2
Lindsay Sanger 215.8
Caroline Archer 237.6
Amanda Stahl 242.4
Emma Battin 250.3
Cassidy Aberson 253.4
Tatum Rask 257.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 0.6% 0.6 33
34 1.1% 1.1 34
35 1.9% 1.9 35
36 3.7% 3.7 36
37 7.9% 7.9 37
38 21.0% 21.0 38
39 62.5% 62.5 39
40 1.3% 1.3 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0