Tennessee
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
242  Megan Murray SO 20:23
345  Niamh Schumacher FR 20:36
886  Abigail Smith FR 21:20
1,222  Peighton Meske JR 21:43
1,227  Rachel Ware FR 21:43
1,577  Taylor Luthringer FR 22:04
1,849  Emma Reed JR 22:23
2,270  Cassidy Giles JR 22:54
2,589  Alaina Riordan FR 23:25
National Rank #106 of 348
South Region Rank #11 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.4%
Top 10 in Regional 50.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Megan Murray Niamh Schumacher Abigail Smith Peighton Meske Rachel Ware Taylor Luthringer Emma Reed Cassidy Giles Alaina Riordan
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 1164 20:42 21:31 21:59 21:42 21:52 22:56 21:51
Paul Short Gold 09/29 1040 20:09 20:51 21:53 22:09 21:39 22:31 22:29 23:30
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 22:07 24:42
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 997 20:18 20:34 21:03 21:38 23:28 22:07 22:48
SEC Championship 10/27 923 20:15 20:16 20:56 21:28 21:38 22:06 23:50 23:01
South Region Championships 11/10 1028 20:19 20:43 21:23 21:46 21:31 22:10 23:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.8 342 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.2 4.4 10.9 33.0 21.5 12.5 6.8 4.7 2.4 1.2 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Megan Murray 11.1% 143.0
Niamh Schumacher 1.7% 166.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Megan Murray 17.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 2.5 3.1 2.8 3.0 3.7 4.3 3.7 3.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.3 4.1 4.0 3.1 2.9 2.5
Niamh Schumacher 27.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.3 2.9 2.6 3.6 3.5 2.4 3.7 3.3 2.4 2.8 2.9
Abigail Smith 78.7 0.1
Peighton Meske 108.2
Rachel Ware 108.3
Taylor Luthringer 134.3
Emma Reed 156.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.1% 0.1 4
5 0.3% 0.3 5
6 0.9% 0.9 6
7 1.2% 1.2 7
8 4.4% 4.4 8
9 10.9% 10.9 9
10 33.0% 33.0 10
11 21.5% 21.5 11
12 12.5% 12.5 12
13 6.8% 6.8 13
14 4.7% 4.7 14
15 2.4% 2.4 15
16 1.2% 1.2 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0