Texas-Arlington
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
649  Tori Shelton SR 21:04
1,225  Astrid Rosvall SO 21:43
1,635  Macey Beazley JR 22:08
1,939  Madeleine Rowe FR 22:28
2,326  Bailey Balmer SO 22:59
2,503  Taylor Repa SO 23:15
2,810  Dasia Rolfe SR 23:57
2,862  Anamarija Petters JR 24:07
National Rank #213 of 348
South Central Region Rank #16 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.3%
Top 20 in Regional 79.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tori Shelton Astrid Rosvall Macey Beazley Madeleine Rowe Bailey Balmer Taylor Repa Dasia Rolfe Anamarija Petters
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 1262 21:30 21:58 22:07 22:38 22:57 23:42 24:34
Chile Pepper Festival 09/29 1212 20:57 21:15 22:09 23:27 22:33 22:54 24:00
Crimson Classic 10/13 1243 20:55 21:25 22:06 22:46 24:00 23:45 24:01
Sun Belt Championship 10/28 1280 21:08 22:14 22:33 23:10 23:45 23:21 24:27
South Region Championships 11/10 1227 20:52 21:48 21:59 22:01 23:24 23:36 24:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.5 477 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 2.0 2.8 3.7 8.2 11.3 13.7 18.3 18.2 12.4 6.1 1.6 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tori Shelton 37.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.5
Astrid Rosvall 69.0
Macey Beazley 95.9
Madeleine Rowe 118.3
Bailey Balmer 155.0
Taylor Repa 170.7
Dasia Rolfe 189.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.4% 0.4 11
12 1.0% 1.0 12
13 2.0% 2.0 13
14 2.8% 2.8 14
15 3.7% 3.7 15
16 8.2% 8.2 16
17 11.3% 11.3 17
18 13.7% 13.7 18
19 18.3% 18.3 19
20 18.2% 18.2 20
21 12.4% 12.4 21
22 6.1% 6.1 22
23 1.6% 1.6 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0