UNC-Greensboro
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,194  Taylor Delaney SO 21:41
1,670  India Godlock FR 22:11
1,857  Kaitlyn Stone SO 22:23
2,021  Ariana Garcia FR 22:34
2,521  Kassidy Dill FR 23:18
2,654  Malea Smith FR 23:32
2,723  Lefler McManus FR 23:42
2,790  Madison Owings FR 23:52
2,819  Kayla Contreras FR 24:00
3,093  Kelsey Barrett SO 25:01
National Rank #246 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #31 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Taylor Delaney India Godlock Kaitlyn Stone Ariana Garcia Kassidy Dill Malea Smith Lefler McManus Madison Owings Kayla Contreras Kelsey Barrett
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 1283 21:25 22:13 22:06 22:58 23:18 23:23 23:46 23:59
ECU Pirates Invitational 10/13 1346 22:35 22:22 23:00 23:24 23:53 24:14 23:50
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1291 22:41 22:10 22:26 21:51 23:26 23:51 23:32 24:07 24:52
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1371 21:51 23:04 23:28 23:40 23:35 24:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.6 936 0.2 0.6 1.6 4.0 9.8 17.6 19.2 16.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Taylor Delaney 133.4
India Godlock 174.8
Kaitlyn Stone 189.8
Ariana Garcia 201.7
Kassidy Dill 239.7
Malea Smith 251.5
Lefler McManus 257.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.2% 0.2 24
25 0.6% 0.6 25
26 1.6% 1.6 26
27 4.0% 4.0 27
28 9.8% 9.8 28
29 17.6% 17.6 29
30 19.2% 19.2 30
31 16.5% 16.5 31
32 10.6% 10.6 32
33 9.0% 9.0 33
34 6.1% 6.1 34
35 3.6% 3.6 35
36 1.4% 1.4 36
37 0.4% 0.4 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0