UNC-Wilmington
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,632  Emme Fisher FR 22:08
2,479  Haley Smithwick FR 23:14
2,580  Kelsey Kiser SO 23:24
2,689  Kylie Knavish SR 23:38
2,818  Leah Behrends FR 23:59
2,824  Julia Ledgett FR 24:00
2,923  Cameron Smithwick FR 24:19
2,995  Sierra Koehler FR 24:34
3,028  Morgan Shires FR 24:42
3,053  Eryn Clark SR 24:48
National Rank #289 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #40 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 40th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emme Fisher Haley Smithwick Kelsey Kiser Kylie Knavish Leah Behrends Julia Ledgett Cameron Smithwick Sierra Koehler Morgan Shires Eryn Clark
Mountain to Sea Open 09/16 1379 22:08 23:13 23:35 23:46 23:57 23:23 24:08 24:16 24:53 25:37
Upstate Invitational 09/30 1393 22:12 23:07 23:59 23:27 23:48 24:17 24:57 24:31 24:48
High Point Vertcross 10/13 1391 22:00 23:33 23:09 23:51 23:49 23:59 24:17 24:23 24:36
CAA Championship 10/28 1364 22:09 23:07 22:45 23:22 24:37 24:11 25:26 24:50 25:10 24:44





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 39.6 1167



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emme Fisher 171.1
Haley Smithwick 235.9
Kelsey Kiser 244.9
Kylie Knavish 255.1
Leah Behrends 266.1
Julia Ledgett 267.1
Cameron Smithwick 277.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 0.3% 0.3 34
35 0.8% 0.8 35
36 2.6% 2.6 36
37 8.0% 8.0 37
38 14.6% 14.6 38
39 21.4% 21.4 39
40 24.3% 24.3 40
41 15.6% 15.6 41
42 8.3% 8.3 42
43 3.5% 3.5 43
44 0.9% 0.9 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0