East Tenn. St.
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
554  Lindsey Stallworth FR 20:56
1,040  Emily Williams-McElroy SR 21:31
1,370  Kaitlyn Lay SO 21:52
1,415  Macy Carrier SR 21:55
2,018  Makayla Shaw FR 22:34
2,138  Heather Feuchtenberger FR 22:42
2,423  Colbie Williamson FR 23:09
2,455  Lindsay Bruce FR 23:11
2,513  Nicki Smith JR 23:17
2,770  Mia DePillo SO 23:50
2,815  Kylie Rutherford SR 23:58
National Rank #184 of 348
South Region Rank #19 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 79.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Lindsey Stallworth Emily Williams-McElroy Kaitlyn Lay Macy Carrier Makayla Shaw Heather Feuchtenberger Colbie Williamson Lindsay Bruce Nicki Smith Mia DePillo Kylie Rutherford
Virginia Tech Alumni Invitational 09/15 1274 21:09 21:58 22:04 23:22 23:06 24:00 23:57
Upstate Invitational 09/30 1212 21:14 21:14 21:54 21:57 22:33 22:50 23:22 23:39 23:41
High Point Vertcross 10/13 1201 21:02 21:24 21:27 21:35 22:54 23:01 23:15 23:24 23:12 23:28 24:21
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1183 20:50 21:31 21:36 21:55 22:33 22:14 22:39 22:50 22:44
South Region Championships 11/10 1148 20:30 21:33 22:12 22:02 22:20 22:41 23:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.6 551 0.3 0.5 1.4 2.6 3.8 7.0 12.5 20.8 17.8 13.4 10.2 6.3 2.6 0.9 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lindsey Stallworth 0.0% 183.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lindsey Stallworth 47.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 0.5
Emily Williams-McElroy 92.6
Kaitlyn Lay 120.4
Macy Carrier 123.4
Makayla Shaw 169.2
Heather Feuchtenberger 180.2
Colbie Williamson 206.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 0.5% 0.5 12
13 1.4% 1.4 13
14 2.6% 2.6 14
15 3.8% 3.8 15
16 7.0% 7.0 16
17 12.5% 12.5 17
18 20.8% 20.8 18
19 17.8% 17.8 19
20 13.4% 13.4 20
21 10.2% 10.2 21
22 6.3% 6.3 22
23 2.6% 2.6 23
24 0.9% 0.9 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0