Iona
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
73  Emma O'Brien FR 19:50
140  Egle Morenaite FR 20:06
227  Sophie Murphy FR 20:20
437  Rachel Garn SR 20:46
558  Julia Kearley JR 20:56
623  Jessica Scheriff JR 21:02
640  Dani Martino JR 21:03
799  Niamh O'Connor SO 21:15
845  Cassandra Gill SR 21:18
1,229  Kaitlyn Ohrtman FR 21:43
1,367  Kara McKenna SR 21:52
1,576  Hannah Molloy FR 22:04
1,890  Natalie Holder SR 22:25
2,106  Shannon O'Hehir JR 22:39
2,583  Helena Keenan SO 23:24
2,644  Danika Jensen SR 23:31
3,094  Skylar Sweet FR 25:01
3,232  Moriah Raysor FR 26:08
National Rank #36 of 348
Northeast Region Rank #4 of 44
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 23.4%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 6.5%


Regional Champion 5.7%
Top 5 in Regional 71.1%
Top 10 in Regional 99.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma O'Brien Egle Morenaite Sophie Murphy Rachel Garn Julia Kearley Jessica Scheriff Dani Martino Niamh O'Connor Cassandra Gill Kaitlyn Ohrtman Kara McKenna
Iona College Meet of Champions 09/15 1055 20:29 20:38 21:08 22:32
Paul Short Gold 09/29 1059 20:37 20:45 21:00 21:50 21:29
NYC Metropolitan Championship 10/13 1168 20:19
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 21:46
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 981 19:50 21:00 21:11 21:38 21:28
MAAC Championship 10/28 838 20:12 20:18 20:54 21:11 21:17 20:45 21:03 21:15 22:49 21:38
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 802 20:02 20:23 21:03 20:30 21:03 21:02 21:29





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 23.4% 23.3 559 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.7 2.6 1.3 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.4 1.4 0.3
Region Championship 100% 4.4 145 5.7 13.4 17.3 17.4 17.4 14.5 9.8 3.2 1.2 0.1 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma O'Brien 71.8% 70.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3
Egle Morenaite 32.3% 105.6 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sophie Murphy 24.1% 140.0
Rachel Garn 23.4% 199.9
Julia Kearley 23.4% 218.3
Jessica Scheriff 23.4% 225.3
Dani Martino 23.4% 228.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma O'Brien 5.8 1.2 5.9 10.0 10.4 12.0 12.7 11.1 8.9 6.7 4.0 3.6 3.5 2.1 1.7 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4
Egle Morenaite 12.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.9 3.0 4.8 5.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.3 5.6 6.1 6.0 4.4 4.2 3.1 3.7 3.2 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.3 1.2
Sophie Murphy 20.9 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.3 2.3 2.4 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 4.3 3.3 4.2 4.1 3.6 3.8 4.3 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.5
Rachel Garn 45.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.6 1.3
Julia Kearley 61.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5
Jessica Scheriff 69.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Dani Martino 72.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 5.7% 100.0% 5.7 5.7 1
2 13.4% 100.0% 13.4 13.4 2
3 17.3% 22.8% 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 13.4 4.0 3
4 17.4% 2.0% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 17.1 0.4 4
5 17.4% 0.3% 0.1 17.4 0.1 5
6 14.5% 14.5 6
7 9.8% 9.8 7
8 3.2% 3.2 8
9 1.2% 1.2 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.2% 0.2 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
Total 100% 23.4% 5.7 13.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 76.7 19.0 4.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0