South Florida
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,739  Rania Samhouri FR 22:16
2,040  Sarah Hartman SR 22:35
2,291  Claire Farnsworth SO 22:56
2,469  Yaranel Abreu JR 23:13
2,719  Nicole Taggart FR 23:42
2,822  Annie Allmark FR 24:00
2,893  Brianna Rischar JR 24:12
2,968  Sara Bowden JR 24:29
3,089  Keschel Hernandez SO 25:00
National Rank #270 of 348
South Region Rank #32 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 36th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rania Samhouri Sarah Hartman Claire Farnsworth Yaranel Abreu Nicole Taggart Annie Allmark Brianna Rischar Sara Bowden Keschel Hernandez
Embry-Riddle Asics Classic 09/16 1340 22:20 22:34 23:11 23:11 23:38 23:44 24:09 24:16
FSU Invitational 10/06 1346 22:03 23:00 22:45 23:16 23:54 24:42 25:30 24:18
AAC Championship 10/28 1310 22:11 22:24 22:34 22:51 23:45 23:39 24:56 24:14 25:18
South Region Championships 11/10 1340 22:30 22:28 22:49 23:44 23:31 24:04 24:30





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.0 956 0.1 0.5 1.0 3.0 3.9 5.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rania Samhouri 148.8
Sarah Hartman 172.1
Claire Farnsworth 194.6
Yaranel Abreu 210.4
Nicole Taggart 232.2
Annie Allmark 241.8
Brianna Rischar 248.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.5% 0.5 27
28 1.0% 1.0 28
29 3.0% 3.0 29
30 3.9% 3.9 30
31 5.9% 5.9 31
32 8.7% 8.7 32
33 11.1% 11.1 33
34 16.5% 16.5 34
35 20.2% 20.2 35
36 22.0% 22.0 36
37 5.9% 5.9 37
38 1.2% 1.2 38
39 0.3% 0.3 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0