Tulane
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
388  Lauren Bartels SR 20:40
510  Emma Newton SR 20:51
1,044  Mckenzie Melius SO 21:31
1,287  Bridgid Selfors FR 21:46
1,586  Sarah Cella SO 22:05
2,147  Jennifer LaMori SR 22:43
2,297  Mary Catherine Stovall SO 22:57
2,763  Paige Fatland SO 23:47
2,873  Aislinn Roberts SO 24:09
National Rank #133 of 348
South Central Region Rank #9 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.4%
Top 10 in Regional 86.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren Bartels Emma Newton Mckenzie Melius Bridgid Selfors Sarah Cella Jennifer LaMori Mary Catherine Stovall Paige Fatland Aislinn Roberts
Sugar Bowl Invite 09/09 1251 21:24 22:00 22:46 22:25 24:10 23:31
LSU Invitational 09/16 1119 20:58 20:42 21:28 21:27 22:00 22:10 22:13 24:19 24:35
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/29 1105 20:35 20:56 21:37 21:32 21:48 22:46 23:24
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 1141 20:43 20:57 21:36 22:12 22:30 22:53 22:58
AAC Championship 10/28 1082 20:33 20:51 21:07 21:58 22:04 23:05 23:25 23:27 24:22
South Region Championships 11/10 1120 20:36 20:58 21:39 21:44 22:10 22:24 22:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.5 281 0.4 2.9 32.4 24.3 16.7 10.1 5.9 3.7 1.8 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Bartels 0.3% 191.5
Emma Newton 0.1% 188.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Bartels 23.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.4 3.1 3.6 4.4 5.1 6.3 7.1 6.0 6.0 6.4 5.6
Emma Newton 29.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.4 1.6 2.5 2.4 3.8 4.2 4.7 4.8
Mckenzie Melius 58.0 0.1
Bridgid Selfors 72.3
Sarah Cella 91.1
Jennifer LaMori 135.7
Mary Catherine Stovall 152.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.4% 0.4 5
6 2.9% 2.9 6
7 32.4% 32.4 7
8 24.3% 24.3 8
9 16.7% 16.7 9
10 10.1% 10.1 10
11 5.9% 5.9 11
12 3.7% 3.7 12
13 1.8% 1.8 13
14 1.2% 1.2 14
15 0.4% 0.4 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0