Central Connecticut St.
Northeast
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.
RatingRank vs Preseason
INCC Stats Predictive Rating -9.3 308 45%
INCC Stats Results Rating -6.1 254 83%
Consistency 0.17 293
Pace 63.5 309
Improvement -3.6 307

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense D+ 255 C- D C D+ F
Defense D+ 325 C- C- F+ C+ F+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 31% 342 C+ 60% 133 -3.9 315
2 Pt. Jumpers 53% 40 C 39% 149 +5.0 12
Three Pointers 36% 286 C 34% 162 -2.4 266
Selection / Accuracy F -2.1 357 C+ +0.9 133
1st FG Attempt C- 0.99 217
Second Chance D+ 26.5% 288 D+ 0.96 283 D 0.26 301
Opponents' Steals C- 10.1% 258
Other Turnovers C+ 6.8% 133
Turnovers C 16.9% 209
Freethrows D- 0.25 337 B+ 78% 19 D+ 0.19 281
Total Offense D+ -3.2 255

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C+ 50% 140 B- 9.2% 86
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D+ 19% 268 B- 3.5% 76
Three Pointers D+ 80% 272 F 2.2% 357
Total D 49% 307 B- 4.8% 86

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 43% 58 C+ 56% 126 +1.9 244
2 Pt. Jumpers 14% 356 D+ 41% 291 -2.3 20
Three Pointers 43% 111 C- 35% 249 +1.9 283
Selection / Accuracy F+ +1.2 357 C +0.3 193
1st FG Attempt C- 1.05 230
Second Chance C- 31.8% 254 C 1.03 172 C- 0.33 230
Turnovers from Steals D 7.7% 303
Other Turnovers F 5.0% 361
Turnovers F+ 12.8% 355
Freethrows B- 0.27 73 F 80% 364 C+ 0.21 139
Total Defense D+ -6.1 325

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C 48% 172 C 11.5% 153
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C 27% 215 B 7.0% 59
Three Pointers D 88% 300 C+ 1.0% 127
Total D+ 59% 256 C+ 6.4% 110
Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.8 323 17.4 198
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.11 349 0.16 146
Consistency 0.16 352 0.16 351
Improvement -1.0 244 -2.7 308



Stat Type Preseason Nov 9 Dec 7 Jan 4 Jan 18 Feb 1 Feb 15 Feb 22 Mar 1 Mar 8 Mar 15
Predictive Rank 311 325 264 271 261 300 291 302 306 308 308
Results Rank 332 157 222 190 259 246 251 247 253 254
Projected Overall Record 14 - 15 12 - 17 17 - 12 17 - 12 18 - 11 15 - 14 17 - 12 17 - 13 17 - 12 16 - 12 16 - 12
Projected Conference Record 10 - 6 8 - 8 11 - 5 11 - 5 13 - 3 10 - 6 12 - 4 11 - 5 12 - 4 12 - 4 12 - 4
Conference Champion 18% 16% 25% 17% 33% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Conference Finish 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2
NCAA Tournament Seed
Opening Round Bye 13% 9% 36% 37% 49% 14% 21% 9% 3% -100% -100%
At-Large Tourney Chance 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
At Large Status Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible



Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
Thu, Nov 6 222 Quinnipiac L 49 - 71 20% -12  2% 0 - 1 F -22 F -24 F D A- B- +1 D+ A+ F
Tue, Nov 11 136 Boston College W 60 - 59 10% -4  8% 1 - 1 B- +6 D- -5 B- F+ D- A+ +10 A A C
Sun, Nov 16 200 Massachusetts L 77 - 84 17% -12  0% 1 - 2 D+ -6 D -7 D+ D+ C C+ +1 B F B+
Fri, Nov 21 105 Rutgers W 67 - 54 6% +5  80% 2 - 2 A +21 C+ +4 C- F+ A+ A+ +18 A A+ B-
Mon, Nov 24 291 Sacred Heart W 108 - 106 OT 57% +2  66% 3 - 2 D -9 A- +9 A- A+ C F -18 F D- F+
Wed, Dec 3 52 Seton Hall L 61 - 77 2% -9  2% 3 - 3 C -1 C+ +4 A+ F C- D- -7 F A+ D-
Sun, Dec 7 292 Northeastern L 56 - 73 34% -14  4% 3 - 4 F -22 F -24 F F B+ B- +1 C C D
Sat, Dec 13 358 Binghamton W 84 - 67 70% +8  87% 4 - 4 C+ +2 A- +7 A+ D- F D+ -3 D+ D+ F+
Thu, Dec 18 255 Fairfield L 70 - 84 47% -14  16% 4 - 5 F -23 D- -6 F B A- F -17 F D+ D
Fri, Jan 2 221 LIU Brooklyn L 78 - 84 20% -1  33% 4 - 6 0 - 1 D+ -6 A+ +19 A+ C- A F -26 F F F
Sun, Jan 4 322 New Haven W 72 - 61 67% +10  99% 5 - 6 1 - 1 C- -3 B+ +8 A C+ C+ F+ -8 C+ F C+
Thu, Jan 8 330 Stonehill W 76 - 69 70% +6  98% 6 - 6 2 - 1 D+ -8 C +4 B+ A F D- -11 F B C
Sat, Jan 10 298 Le Moyne W 69 - 59 36% +6  89% 7 - 6 3 - 1 C+ +4 F -9 F D D- A+ +13 A+ C- D+
Sat, Jan 17 354 Saint Francis (PA) W 98 - 90 62% +7  98% 8 - 6 4 - 1 C- -4 A+ +18 A+ F A+ F -22 F+ F F
Mon, Jan 19 282 Mercyhurst L 61 - 79 32% -14  0% 8 - 7 4 - 2 F -22 D- -7 F B C+ F -18 F D+ D
Fri, Jan 23 334 Fairleigh Dickinson L 66 - 76 72% -4  42% 8 - 8 4 - 3 F -25 D -5 D- B- F+ F -23 F B+ F
Mon, Jan 26 330 Stonehill L 59 - 61 47% +3  79% 8 - 9 4 - 4 D -11 F -10 B- F F B- -0 D+ B+ C
Thu, Jan 29 305 Wagner W 62 - 55 38% +2  63% 9 - 9 5 - 4 C +1 D- -6 D+ F+ D+ A +8 A+ C+ F
Sat, Jan 31 221 LIU Brooklyn L 59 - 80 39% -2  40% 9 - 10 5 - 5 F -27 F -15 F F B- F -14 F+ D F
Thu, Feb 5 344 Chicago St. W 78 - 67 76% +3  66% 10 - 10 6 - 5 D+ -6 B- +4 B+ A- F D- -8 D+ A+ F
Sat, Feb 7 305 Wagner W 84 - 67 61% +9  91% 11 - 10 7 - 5 C+ +5 B+ +9 A A+ D+ C- -3 A- C- F
Thu, Feb 12 322 New Haven W 81 - 76 44% +6  87% 12 - 10 8 - 5 C- -3 B +6 A+ F F F -9 C+ F D
Sat, Feb 14 334 Fairleigh Dickinson W 63 - 57 50% +5  93% 13 - 10 9 - 5 C- -3 D+ -2 F C- B+ C +0 A+ F D-
Thu, Feb 19 298 Le Moyne W 78 - 77 59% +8  99% 14 - 10 10 - 5 D -11 D -3 B+ F B- D -8 F A D-
Sat, Feb 21 344 Chicago St. L 51 - 70 55% -5  23% 14 - 11 10 - 6 F -30 F -23 F C- F+ F+ -9 C+ F F
Thu, Feb 26 282 Mercyhurst W 80 - 78 55% +0  51% 15 - 11 11 - 6 D+ -8 C+ +3 B A- A F -12 F C F
Sat, Feb 28 354 Saint Francis (PA) W 69 - 64 81% +1  61% 16 - 11 12 - 6 D- -13 F+ -11 C- F D D+ -2 C+ C C+
Wed, Mar 4 305 Wagner L 60 - 70 61% -1  44% 16 - 12 F -22 F -13 F D- B F -11 C- C+ F
Totals 16 - 12 12 - 6 -9 D+ -3 C C+ F D+ -6 C B+ D+


Stat History by Game

Date Opponent Result Stats Rank Proj Record Chances Predicted At-Large Status
Predictive Results Overall Conf Opening Bye Conf
Champ		 NCAA
Seed		 Conf
Finish
Preseason 311 14 - 15 10 - 6 13% 18% 4 Negligible 0%
Thu, Nov 6 222 Quinnipiac L 49 - 71 326 340 12 - 17 7 - 9 8% 14% 5 Negligible 0%
Tue, Nov 11 136 Boston College W 60 - 59 305 165 15 - 14 8 - 8 27% 21% 3 Negligible 0%
Sun, Nov 16 200 Massachusetts L 77 - 84 295 203 14 - 15 9 - 7 23% 19% 3 Negligible 0%
Fri, Nov 21 105 Rutgers W 67 - 54 251 127 18 - 11 11 - 5 45% 33% 16 2 Negligible 0%
Mon, Nov 24 291 Sacred Heart W 108 - 106 OT 251 117 18 - 11 11 - 5 49% 32% 2 Negligible 0%
Wed, Dec 3 52 Seton Hall L 61 - 77 244 135 18 - 11 12 - 4 50% 32% 2 Negligible 0%
Sun, Dec 7 292 Northeastern L 56 - 73 264 157 17 - 12 11 - 5 36% 25% 3 Negligible 0%
Sat, Dec 13 358 Binghamton W 84 - 67 241 155 18 - 11 12 - 4 48% 32% 2 Negligible 0%
Thu, Dec 18 255 Fairfield L 70 - 84 276 194 17 - 12 11 - 5 33% 22% 3 Negligible 0%
Fri, Jan 2 221 LIU Brooklyn L 78 - 84 278 226 16 - 13 11 - 5 33% 14% 3 Negligible 0%
Sun, Jan 4 322 New Haven W 72 - 61 271 222 17 - 12 11 - 5 37% 17% 3 Negligible 0%
Thu, Jan 8 330 Stonehill W 76 - 69 270 220 17 - 12 11 - 5 35% 19% 3 Negligible 0%
Sat, Jan 10 298 Le Moyne W 69 - 59 262 195 18 - 11 12 - 4 47% 31% 2 Negligible 0%
Sat, Jan 17 354 Saint Francis (PA) W 98 - 90 261 189 18 - 11 13 - 3 44% 33% 2 Negligible 0%
Mon, Jan 19 282 Mercyhurst L 61 - 79 277 219 17 - 12 12 - 4 34% 24% 2 Negligible 0%
Fri, Jan 23 334 Fairleigh Dickinson L 66 - 76 291 235 16 - 13 11 - 5 22% 10% 3 Negligible 0%
Mon, Jan 26 330 Stonehill L 59 - 61 295 257 15 - 14 10 - 6 18% 4% 4 Negligible 0%
Thu, Jan 29 305 Wagner W 62 - 55 292 243 16 - 13 11 - 5 25% 6% 3 Negligible 0%
Sat, Jan 31 221 LIU Brooklyn L 59 - 80 300 258 15 - 14 10 - 6 19% 1% 3 Negligible 0%
Thu, Feb 5 344 Chicago St. W 78 - 67 299 261 16 - 13 10 - 6 17% 1% 3 Negligible 0%
Sat, Feb 7 305 Wagner W 84 - 67 293 257 16 - 13 11 - 5 21% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Thu, Feb 12 322 New Haven W 81 - 76 290 254 16 - 13 11 - 5 20% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Sat, Feb 14 334 Fairleigh Dickinson W 63 - 57 291 245 17 - 12 12 - 4 20% 2% 2 Negligible 0%
Thu, Feb 19 298 Le Moyne W 78 - 77 293 242 18 - 12 12 - 4 23% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Sat, Feb 21 344 Chicago St. L 51 - 70 303 250 17 - 13 11 - 5 9% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Thu, Feb 26 282 Mercyhurst W 80 - 78 302 249 17 - 12 12 - 4 5% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Sat, Feb 28 354 Saint Francis (PA) W 69 - 64 305 245 17 - 12 12 - 4 3% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Wed, Mar 4 305 Wagner L 60 - 70 309 256 16 - 12 12 - 4 -100% 0% 2 Negligible 0%
Selection Sunday 308 254 16 - 12 12 - 4 -100% 0% 2 Negligible 0%


Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Pts Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Pts Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D+ C+ C C C+ 31% 53% 36% F C- D+ D+ D C D- B+ D+ D+ C+ D+ C- C 43% 14% 43% F+ C- C- C C- F+ B- F C+
1.05 60% 39% 34% +1 -2 0.99 27% 1.0 .26 17% .25 78% .19 1.12 56% 41% 35% 0 +1 1.05 32% 1.0 .33 13% .27 80% .20
Nov
6		 Quinnipiac F F F+ F F 26% 34% 40% F F D C- D A- D- F F B- B D- D+ C- 47% 17% 37% F D+ A- A+ A+ F A+ D+ A+
0.71 36% 28% 19% -18 -3 0.60 28% 1.0 .28 13% .23 64% .15 1.03 50% 40% 36% -2 +1 1.00 26% 0.6 .16 7% .11 71% .08
Nov
11		 Boston Col D- F+ A- A B+ 31% 33% 37% F+ B- B+ F F+ D- F F+ F A+ B+ D A+ A+ 33% 16% 51% D A D A+ A C A+ F B+
0.92 47% 44% 39% +1 -2 1.00 32% 0.4 .14 18% .19 60% .11 0.90 50% 44% 21% -11 0 0.80 34% 0.6 .20 15% .16 89% .14
Nov
16		 Umass D C+ F A- C- 43% 31% 27% D- D+ F A+ D+ C A+ D- A- C+ A B- C- B+ 40% 19% 40% D+ B F F+ F B+ F A+ B-
0.99 62% 27% 38% 0 -1 1.00 16% 1.6 .25 17% .48 68% .32 1.08 48% 36% 35% -4 0 0.95 44% 1.3 .56 22% .41 48% .20
Nov
21		 Rutgers C+ C- D A C+ 31% 37% 33% F C- C+ F F+ A+ C D+ C- A+ A- A A A+ 35% 29% 37% C- A A- A+ A+ B- A+ B A+
1.08 56% 32% 41% +1 -3 0.98 33% 0.5 .18 11% .25 71% .18 0.87 47% 29% 28% -10 -1 0.80 26% 0.8 .21 16% .19 70% .13
Nov
24		 Sacred Heart A- A+ B A- A 46% 28% 26% D A- D A+ A+ C A+ B+ A+ F C F F F 39% 16% 44% D F C- F D- F+ F F F
1.32 77% 44% 40% +13 0 1.26 28% 1.9 .52 13% .47 76% .35 1.30 58% 50% 44% +9 +1 1.21 27% 1.2 .33 15% .37 96% .36
Dec
3		 Seton Hall C+ B+ F A+ A+ 41% 18% 41% C+ A+ D F F C- F B+ F+ D- A+ C F F 49% 16% 35% F+ F B A+ A+ D- A- F B-
0.96 61% 25% 44% +5 +1 1.14 26% 0.3 .06 24% .25 75% .19 1.21 44% 38% 61% +7 +1 1.20 32% 0.5 .18 13% .27 80% .22
Dec
7		 Northeastern F F F F F 44% 25% 31% D+ F F F F B+ F+ F F B- C+ D+ C C+ 44% 10% 46% F+ C A F C D B- F D+
0.82 50% 14% 24% -14 0 0.73 21% 0.7 .15 13% .29 59% .17 1.07 57% 40% 33% -1 +2 1.04 19% 1.5 .29 15% .24 86% .21
Dec
13		 Binghamton A- A+ C A+ A+ 42% 19% 38% C- A+ F+ C- D- F F C+ F D+ D A+ A C+ 56% 9% 35% F D+ C F D+ F+ F C F
1.29 82% 40% 45% +17 0 1.37 25% 1.0 .25 18% .21 73% .15 1.03 63% 25% 27% -3 +3 1.02 19% 1.0 .19 17% .44 75% .33
Dec
18		 Fairfield D- F D+ C F 30% 22% 48% F F C A+ B A- F+ A+ D+ F D F F F 40% 15% 45% F+ F B- F D+ D B- F C
1.06 31% 33% 35% -9 -1 0.83 30% 1.3 .40 12% .22 85% .19 1.27 59% 50% 44% +9 +1 1.22 31% 1.1 .34 14% .23 77% .17
Jan
2		 LIU Brooklyn A+ B+ B A+ A+ 37% 30% 33% F A+ C D+ C- A C- A- C+ F A+ F F F 42% 10% 48% F F F C F F F C+ F+
1.33 65% 43% 53% +13 -1 1.26 35% 1.0 .35 14% .32 75% .24 1.43 45% 60% 48% +7 +2 1.19 54% 0.9 .51 9% .37 65% .24
Jan
4		 New Haven B+ C- B+ A+ A+ 29% 23% 48% F+ A D+ A- C+ C+ F F+ F F+ B- B- B+ B 37% 12% 51% F+ C+ F F F C+ A+ B+ A+
1.23 57% 45% 48% +11 -1 1.23 25% 1.3 .32 15% .14 71% .10 1.04 56% 33% 28% -6 +1 0.92 40% 1.1 .46 19% .06 67% .04
Jan
8		 Stonehill C A B A+ A+ 28% 40% 33% F B+ D A+ A F A+ A+ A+ D- B- F F F 55% 6% 39% F F F+ A+ B C B- B+ B-
1.15 67% 41% 43% +8 -3 1.12 24% 1.8 .44 20% .45 83% .38 1.04 50% 67% 40% +1 +3 1.10 32% 0.5 .18 20% .21 64% .13
Jan
10		 Le Moyne F C+ A+ F D- 24% 39% 37% F F B- F D D- A+ A- A+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ 51% 6% 43% F A+ C- C C- D+ B+ F C-
0.97 58% 47% 17% -6 -3 0.84 34% 0.8 .26 17% .44 81% .36 0.83 37% 33% 17% -22 +3 0.64 25% 1.0 .25 18% .28 88% .24
Jan
17		 Francis (PA) A+ A+ B A+ A+ 28% 34% 38% F A+ F B F A+ A+ A A+ F C- D- F F 18% 30% 52% A+ F+ F D- F F F D F
1.43 85% 44% 56% +22 -2 1.40 16% 1.3 .20 10% .55 79% .44 1.32 60% 41% 41% +7 -3 1.11 41% 1.1 .44 9% .35 73% .26
Jan
19		 Mercyhurst D- D F F F 35% 25% 40% D- F B+ C+ B C+ F A+ D F B- F F F 37% 33% 29% D+ F F A- D+ D A+ F A+
0.99 53% 25% 21% -13 -1 0.75 38% 1.1 .40 16% .29 80% .23 1.28 53% 59% 60% +16 -2 1.31 33% 0.9 .30 13% .07 100% .07
Jan
23		 FDU D F A+ F+ D 36% 34% 30% F D- A- D B- F+ F+ A+ D+ F F A+ F F 40% 20% 40% D+ F A+ D B+ F A- F B-
1.12 50% 60% 31% +3 -2 1.05 36% 0.9 .32 19% .27 85% .23 1.29 70% 20% 50% +11 0 1.24 21% 1.0 .21 9% .20 82% .17
Jan
26		 Stonehill F C- C+ A+ B 47% 31% 22% D B- F D+ F F F F F B- F F A+ C- 47% 9% 44% F D+ D+ A+ B+ C F B- F
0.90 54% 38% 45% +2 -1 1.04 17% 1.0 .17 20% .08 50% .04 0.93 71% 50% 15% -5 +2 0.96 29% 0.6 .17 20% .46 67% .30
Jan
29		 Wagner D- B+ F F+ D+ 43% 13% 43% C+ D+ F A- F+ D+ D- B- D A A F A+ A+ 40% 7% 53% F A+ C+ B- C+ F F B F
1.03 65% 17% 30% -2 +1 1.00 18% 1.2 .21 15% .31 75% .24 0.92 41% 67% 17% -18 +2 0.70 31% 1.0 .31 12% .41 68% .28
Jan
31		 LIU Brooklyn F C- F F+ F 25% 33% 41% F F F+ F F B- D A+ B+ F D+ B+ F D- 51% 19% 30% F+ F+ B- F D F F F F
0.89 54% 18% 29% -11 -3 0.75 27% 0.8 .22 17% .29 94% .27 1.21 63% 33% 43% +5 +1 1.15 31% 1.2 .38 14% .44 76% .33
Feb
5		 Chicago St. B- A+ A+ B A- 24% 17% 59% F+ B+ B- A A- F A- A+ A+ D- F+ A+ C+ C- 35% 24% 41% F D+ A+ A+ A+ F B- F C-
1.25 80% 57% 38% +12 -1 1.24 39% 1.3 .52 24% .40 89% .36 1.07 63% 23% 32% -3 -1 0.94 17% 0.7 .11 5% .24 86% .20
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
7		 Wagner B+ A+ F A+ A+ 36% 43% 21% F A C+ A+ A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ C- A+ D- A A 41% 20% 39% D A- C D C- F B- C+ B-
1.28 87% 28% 56% +13 -3 1.21 32% 1.7 .55 15% .56 77% .43 1.02 39% 45% 27% -10 0 0.82 31% 1.2 .36 14% .25 71% .18
Feb
12		 New Haven B A+ B A+ A+ 30% 35% 35% F A+ F+ F F F A+ D A+ F A- F+ A B 50% 19% 31% F+ C+ D- F F D F F F
1.17 79% 44% 56% +20 -2 1.37 19% 0.6 .12 22% .41 73% .30 1.10 50% 44% 27% -6 +1 0.92 26% 1.6 .42 16% .38 95% .36
Feb
14		 FDU D+ C B+ F D- 18% 49% 33% F F B+ F C- B+ C A+ A C A+ A+ A+ A+ 38% 14% 48% F+ A+ F F F D- F F F
1.12 63% 45% 27% +1 -5 0.93 34% 0.7 .25 12% .34 94% .32 1.01 44% 17% 10% -26 +1 0.52 44% 1.1 .49 16% .48 83% .40
Feb
19		 Le Moyne D A+ A+ D+ A+ 21% 32% 48% F B+ F F F B- F A+ F D A- F+ F F 42% 21% 37% C+ F B+ A+ A D- B D- C+
1.10 77% 55% 33% +9 -3 1.14 17% 0.8 .14 13% .02 100% .02 1.09 50% 45% 53% +8 0 1.19 19% 0.7 .13 17% .29 76% .22
Feb
21		 Chicago St. F F C F F 39% 17% 43% D+ F C D+ C- F+ D+ B C- F+ C- A- A B 38% 19% 43% F C+ C- F F F B F C+
0.82 33% 38% 20% -19 0 0.65 35% 1.1 .38 23% .31 80% .25 1.13 55% 30% 26% -8 0 0.87 30% 1.5 .43 8% .21 83% .18
Feb
26		 Mercyhurst C+ B+ B A A- 43% 36% 21% F B F A+ A- A A+ C A F C- F A- F 44% 29% 27% F F B- D- C F C- F D-
1.18 65% 41% 40% +6 -2 1.11 22% 2.0 .44 13% .47 71% .34 1.15 58% 63% 27% +4 -1 1.09 23% 1.1 .26 10% .23 86% .20
Feb
28		 Francis (PA) F+ C+ A+ C C 43% 28% 30% F+ C- D F F D F A+ F D+ F A+ A+ B- 51% 18% 31% F C+ D B+ C C+ F D F
1.06 65% 54% 36% +8 -1 1.17 29% 0.5 .14 20% .21 91% .19 0.99 70% 13% 21% -5 +1 0.96 31% 0.8 .25 20% .35 72% .25
Mar
4		 Wagner F F D C- F+ 29% 41% 29% F F C- F D- B F F+ F F A D- F+ C- 42% 22% 36% D+ C- A- F C+ F A- F C
0.98 47% 33% 33% -6 -3 0.84 29% 0.8 .23 11% .28 67% .18 1.14 43% 45% 39% -2 0 0.98 25% 1.3 .31 8% .21 92% .19