Minnesota
Big Ten
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +9.2 61
Results Rating +7.5 83
Consistency 0.18 327
Pace 59.5 363
Improvement +3.6 54

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense B- 74 B C- C+ C+ B-
Defense B 64 B- B+ B- A- B+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 39% 183 B+ 66% 32 +3.2 71
2 Pt. Jumpers 22% 338 C 39% 154 -2.5 302
Three Pointers 48% 46 C+ 35% 135 +4.2 47
Shot Selection/Accuracy B- +0.9 72 B +3.8 68
1st FG Attempt B 1.12 55
Second Chance C- 28.8% 225 C 1.04 165 C- 0.30 198
Opponents' Steals C+ 9.0% 135
Other Turnovers C+ 6.9% 131
Turnovers C+ 15.9% 126
Freethrows B- 0.33 96 D+ 69% 272 C+ 0.23 144
Total Offense B- +4.8 74

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots A 66% 7 B- 9.6% 104
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots A 46% 8 C+ 4.4% 141
Three Pointers A- 94% 8 D- 1.6% 327
Total A+ 74% 1 C+ 5.1% 119


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 33% 316 C 57% 150 -3.4 70
2 Pt. Jumpers 25% 46 C 39% 200 +1.9 323
Three Pointers 41% 149 B- 32% 82 -1.0 139
Shot Selection/Accuracy B+ -0.9 37 C+ -1.6 122
1st FG Attempt B- 0.97 98
Second Chance B 27.1% 67 A- 0.88 18 B+ 0.24 28
Turnovers from Steals B- 10.9% 73
Other Turnovers C+ 7.6% 128
Turnovers B- 18.5% 75
Freethrows A- 0.23 13 C+ 72% 143 A- 0.16 11
Total Defense B +4.4 64

Assists Blocks
Close Shots D+ 53% 281 C 11.6% 147
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots F+ 41% 351 D+ 3.5% 254
Three Pointers B- 80% 64 C- 0.8% 177
Total C- 59% 253 C- 5.1% 212

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.2 267 19.0 354
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.16 187 0.09 10
Consistency 0.14 312 0.13 257
Improvement +3.5 39 +0.1 191

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 72 63 55
Results Rating Rank 92 77 67
Conference Record 7 - 13 8 - 12 8 - 12
Conference Finish 13 11 11
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 0% 0% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 11.5 11.6 11.0
.500 or above 11% 17% 0%
.500 or above in Conference 0% 0% 0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round0% 0% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Northwestern (Home) - 61.9% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a1 - 71 - 7
Quad 1b2 - 43 - 11
Quad 24 - 47 - 15
Quad 31 - 38 - 17
Quad 47 - 015 - 17


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 360 Gardner-Webb W 87 - 60 99% +25  99% 1 - 0 B- +6 C- -1 A- D+ F B+ +6 A A C
 Sat, Nov 8 351 Alcorn St. W 95 - 50 98% +30  98% 2 - 0 A+ +28 A +12 D A+ C+ A+ +16 A+ B- A-
 Wed, Nov 12 46 @Missouri L 60 - 83 30% -3  46% 2 - 1 D -8 C- -2 C C- C F+ -9 F C+ D-
 Sat, Nov 15 210 Green Bay W 72 - 65 OT 91% +1  56% 3 - 1 C +1 F -11 D+ F B A+ +12 A A- A-
 Tue, Nov 18 348 Chicago St. W 66 - 54 98% +6  91% 4 - 1 C- -4 F -10 F F B- A- +7 B B- B+
 Sat, Nov 22 122 San Francisco L 65 - 77 73% -6  0% 4 - 2 D -9 D+ -3 A D+ F D- -7 D C- B-
 Thu, Nov 27 60 Stanford L 68 - 72 50% -1  33% 4 - 3 B- +5 C+ +3 A A+ D- B- +2 A+ F D
 Fri, Nov 28 44 Santa Clara L 75 - 86 38% -18  0% 4 - 4 C +1 B +7 C- A+ A D- -7 F B+ C-
 Wed, Dec 3 39 Indiana W 73 - 64 44% +1  49% 5 - 4 1 - 0 A +20 B- +5 B A+ F A+ +15 A+ A D-
 Wed, Dec 10 8 @Purdue L 57 - 85 10% -15  0% 5 - 5 1 - 1 C- -5 D- -6 F+ D A- C -0 C+ D+ C+
 Sun, Dec 14 299 Texas Southern W 89 - 53 96% +20  94% 6 - 5 A+ +25 B+ +9 A+ D C A+ +16 A A+ A+
 Sun, Dec 21 185 Campbell W 78 - 50 90% +18  97% 7 - 5 A+ +23 A- +11 A A+ C- A+ +17 A- A+ A+
 Mon, Dec 29 337 Fairleigh Dickinson W 60 - 43 98% +7  78% 8 - 5 C+ +2 F -14 F B- F A+ +18 A A+ A
 Sat, Jan 3 66 @Northwestern W 84 - 78 40% -2  20% 9 - 5 2 - 1 A- +18 A+ +19 A+ B+ B C -1 D+ A+ F
 Tue, Jan 6 29 Iowa W 70 - 67 38% +6  91% 10 - 5 3 - 1 A- +15 C +1 B F A+ A+ +14 A+ A+ A+
 Fri, Jan 9 70 USC L 69 - 70 OT 63% -3  23% 10 - 6 3 - 2 C+ +5 C+ +2 B- C+ C+ B- +2 D+ A+ A+
 Tue, Jan 13 24 Wisconsin L 75 - 78 36% +1  67% 10 - 7 3 - 3 B +10 A- +10 A F+ A+ C -0 C- A+ C-
 Sat, Jan 17 5 @Illinois L 67 - 77 7% -2  28% 10 - 8 3 - 4 A- +15 A- +9 B A+ B- B +5 B A- A-
 Tue, Jan 20 28 @Ohio St. L 74 - 82 OT 20% -2  17% 10 - 9 3 - 5 B +10 B- +5 B- D+ A B+ +5 A- C- C-
 Sat, Jan 24 15 Nebraska L 57 - 76 27% -4  27% 10 - 10 3 - 6 C- -3 D+ -4 B+ F C C -1 C- A+ D+
 Wed, Jan 28 24 @Wisconsin L 63 - 67 18% +8  85% 10 - 11 3 - 7 A- +15 C +0 A D- D+ A+ +14 C A+ A+
 Sun, Feb 1 119 @Penn St. L 75 - 77 63% -6  2% 10 - 12 3 - 8 C+ +4 B +7 C+ A+ C D+ -3 B F C+
 Wed, Feb 4 9 Michigan St. W 76 - 73 22% +8  97% 11 - 12 4 - 8 A +20 A+ +19 A+ D+ A+ C+ +1 A- C- D
 Sun, Feb 8 109 Maryland L 62 - 67 79% +1  55% 11 - 13 4 - 9 C- -4 B- +4 B+ B- C F -10 D- B- C+
 Sat, Feb 14 49 @Washington L 57 - 69 31% -8  15% 11 - 14 4 - 10 C+ +2 C- -2 B- C F B- +2 F F A+
 Tue, Feb 17 83 @Oregon W 61 - 44 47% +5  89% 12 - 14 5 - 10 A+ +27 C+ +2 B D F A+ +28 A+ A+ B+
 Sat, Feb 21 108 Rutgers W 80 - 61 79% +10  85% 13 - 14 6 - 10 A +20 A+ +20 A+ C+ C+ B- +3 C- A+ D
 Tue, Feb 24 2 @Michigan L 67 - 77 4% -6  12% 13 - 15 6 - 11 A +20 A +13 A+ F A+ B+ +7 C- C A+
 Sat, Feb 28 30 UCLA W 78 - 73 40% +0  48% 14 - 15 7 - 11 A- +17 A+ +26 A+ F A+ F+ -8 C- C D
 Wed, Mar 4 39 @Indiana L 47 - 77 24% -14  2% 14 - 16 7 - 12 D- -13 F -15 F+ F D+ C- -2 D F B
 Sat, Mar 7 66 Northwestern W 70 - 67 62%
Totals 15 - 16 8 - 12 +9 B- +5 A+ B B- B +4 C+ D+ C+



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings B- B+ C C+ B 39% 22% 48% B- B C- C C- C+ B- D+ C+ B C C B- C+ 33% 25% 41% B+ B- B A- B+ B- A- C+ A-
1.15 66% 39% 35% +4 +1 1.12 29% 1.0 .30 16% .33 69% .23 1.02 57% 39% 32% -2 -1 0.97 27% 0.9 .24 19% .23 72% .24
Nov
3		 Gardner-Webb C- A+ F C A- 52% 13% 35% B+ A- C+ F D+ F A+ F A+ B+ C+ A+ D+ A- 37% 29% 33% A+ A D+ A+ A C F A+ F
1.21 84% 17% 35% +11 +2 1.29 38% 0.9 .34 19% .52 67% .34 0.83 53% 7% 35% -11 -1 0.78 25% 0.5 .11 19% .47 59% .28
Nov
8		 Alcorn St. A C- D- F F+ 63% 6% 31% A D A+ B- A+ C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ D A+ 35% 48% 17% A+ A+ C+ B+ B- A- D+ A+ C+
1.36 60% 33% 27% -3 +4 1.04 58% 1.3 .73 17% .64 86% .55 0.72 47% 17% 38% -13 -4 0.69 24% 0.8 .20 23% .28 60% .17
Nov
12		 Missouri C- C- A+ F C 33% 27% 40% C C A F C- C B+ F D F+ F D F F 28% 26% 46% A+ F A+ F C+ D- C C- C-
0.97 53% 67% 22% -1 -1 0.98 39% 0.6 .22 18% .33 53% .18 1.34 85% 42% 48% +18 -1 1.35 13% 3.0 .39 15% .38 70% .27
Nov
15		 Green Bay F A F+ F D+ 35% 21% 44% C D+ D+ F F B A+ F A A+ C A+ A A 41% 16% 43% C- A B+ A A- A- F+ A+ C
1.01 71% 30% 29% -1 0 1.00 27% 0.7 .20 11% .61 51% .32 0.91 57% 25% 27% -7 +1 0.90 19% 0.9 .16 20% .42 63% .26
Nov
18		 Chicago St. F B- B F F+ 29% 17% 54% D F B F F B- A+ C+ A+ A- C C- A+ C+ 31% 47% 22% A B A- C- B- B+ A- A+ A
1.05 67% 43% 27% -2 0 0.98 40% 0.5 .20 18% .52 78% .41 0.86 53% 39% 18% -6 -4 0.82 23% 1.0 .23 19% .20 60% .12
Nov
22		 San Francisco D+ C F A+ B+ 62% 10% 28% A+ A C F+ D+ F A+ F A+ D- A- C F D- 38% 17% 45% C- D D B C- B- D+ D+ D
1.03 58% 25% 45% +4 +3 1.15 28% 0.9 .25 19% .59 50% .29 1.22 50% 38% 48% +6 0 1.15 36% 1.0 .36 17% .36 74% .27
Nov
27		 Stanford C+ C- D A+ A+ 33% 15% 51% B- A D+ A+ A+ D- B- D C B- A F A+ A+ 47% 10% 43% C- A+ F D+ F D C+ D C
1.06 54% 33% 45% +6 0 1.15 24% 1.8 .44 22% .36 72% .26 1.12 46% 60% 23% -11 +2 0.84 47% 1.1 .50 12% .32 78% .25
Nov
28		 Santa Clara B C+ F D- C- 43% 11% 46% B C- A- A+ A+ A A+ C+ A+ D- D+ A F F 26% 17% 57% B+ F A+ F B+ C- B+ C+ B+
1.13 60% 20% 29% -5 +2 0.96 38% 1.3 .50 17% .49 74% .36 1.29 64% 33% 53% +17 0 1.36 19% 1.8 .35 15% .19 73% .14
Dec
3		 Indiana B- B+ F C B 38% 18% 45% B+ B B+ A+ A+ F A+ D A+ A+ A- A+ A- A+ 39% 12% 49% C+ A+ A+ F A D- C- A+ A-
1.10 60% 29% 33% -1 0 1.00 33% 1.4 .47 24% .54 70% .38 0.97 53% 33% 29% -6 +1 0.92 14% 1.4 .20 11% .34 60% .20
Dec
10		 Purdue D- C D+ F F+ 27% 27% 45% C F+ F+ B+ D A- B+ B+ B+ C F+ F+ D+ C 32% 34% 34% A C+ F+ B D+ C+ F A- F+
0.87 57% 36% 22% -9 -2 0.80 14% 1.2 .16 14% .27 73% .20 1.30 73% 50% 38% +11 -2 1.19 44% 1.1 .50 14% .39 68% .27
Dec
14		 Texas Southern B+ A+ F A+ A+ 29% 8% 63% C A+ D+ D D C B+ C+ B+ A+ C C- A+ A 33% 31% 37% B+ A A- A+ A+ A+ B F D+
1.28 79% 25% 43% +14 +1 1.31 29% 1.0 .29 16% .43 72% .31 0.76 56% 40% 17% -10 -2 0.80 20% 0.6 .11 24% .25 92% .23
Dec
21		 Campbell A- A+ F A- A 44% 22% 33% C+ A C- A+ A+ C- F A+ F+ A+ D+ D+ A+ A- 38% 21% 41% A A- C A+ A+ A+ F+ F+ F
1.29 85% 20% 40% +11 0 1.24 30% 2.0 .61 18% .18 89% .16 0.82 60% 38% 19% -9 0 0.85 34% 0.4 .13 28% .44 79% .34
Dec
29		 Fairleigh Dickinson F D+ F D F 26% 15% 60% C- F B+ D+ B- F F F F A+ F+ A+ A A 21% 21% 57% B+ A C- A+ A+ A D+ A+ B-
0.99 58% 14% 32% -5 0 0.91 33% 0.9 .31 20% .25 50% .12 0.71 67% 11% 25% -12 -1 0.76 33% 0.3 .10 23% .30 57% .17
Jan
3		 Northwestern A+ A A+ D- A+ 50% 13% 37% A A+ B- A B+ B A+ A+ A+ C F C- A- D+ 37% 23% 40% C D+ A+ A+ A+ F C+ D- C-
1.27 70% 67% 29% +7 +2 1.20 35% 1.1 .39 17% .47 85% .40 1.18 79% 42% 29% +5 0 1.12 17% 1.0 .17 6% .32 80% .26
Jan
6		 Iowa C B+ A+ F B 40% 18% 42% B- B F F F A+ A+ B- A+ A+ A+ F B- A+ 31% 29% 40% A+ A+ D+ A+ A+ A+ A C A
1.03 67% 63% 26% +3 0 1.09 11% 0.7 .07 15% .48 75% .36 0.98 44% 53% 33% 0 -2 0.98 36% 0.6 .21 21% .24 77% .18
Jan
9		 USC C+ B F B+ B 20% 22% 59% D- B- B+ D C+ C+ C F D- B- D D- C- D 38% 27% 35% B D+ F A+ A+ A+ A- F B-
1.05 60% 27% 37% 0 -1 1.00 36% 0.8 .29 17% .27 60% .16 1.07 67% 46% 35% +6 -1 1.13 45% 0.3 .12 24% .34 82% .28
Jan
13		 Wisconsin A- A A+ D- A+ 38% 27% 35% C A F C+ F+ A+ A+ D- A+ C F+ B+ F D 20% 18% 62% A+ C- A+ C A+ C- C+ C C
1.16 67% 62% 29% +7 -1 1.15 13% 1.0 .13 8% .40 67% .27 1.21 70% 33% 42% +9 -1 1.18 21% 1.2 .24 11% .31 78% .24
Jan
17		 Illinois A- A+ F C- B 19% 30% 52% C- B B+ A+ A+ B- F A+ F+ B B- F C B- 22% 22% 57% A+ B D A+ A- A- D- D- F+
1.09 80% 25% 32% -1 -3 0.94 31% 1.4 .42 11% .05 100% .05 1.25 60% 50% 35% +4 -1 1.07 46% 0.9 .43 16% .37 84% .31
Jan
20		 Ohio St. B- A+ F C- B- 29% 27% 45% C B- D+ C D+ A A+ A A+ B+ D- D+ A A- 33% 28% 39% B- A- D+ C C- C- A- B A-
1.05 71% 23% 32% -2 -1 0.96 24% 1.0 .24 13% .41 80% .33 1.17 72% 47% 29% +4 -1 1.07 37% 1.1 .40 14% .30 72% .22
Jan
24		 Nebraska D+ A+ D+ D- B 27% 13% 60% A B+ D- F F C C+ F D C C F C C 42% 9% 49% D+ C- B- A+ A+ D+ A+ F B+
0.88 77% 33% 28% -1 0 1.00 18% 0.4 .08 20% .23 50% .12 1.17 64% 80% 35% +7 +2 1.19 25% 0.5 .13 12% .16 100% .16
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
28		 Wisconsin C F A+ A+ A 35% 9% 57% A A D- F+ D- D+ D F F A+ A+ B+ F C 26% 7% 67% C+ C A+ A+ A+ A+ F B+ F
0.99 44% 75% 42% +5 +1 1.15 17% 0.8 .14 17% .21 55% .11 1.05 45% 33% 43% +5 +1 1.14 17% 0.6 .10 20% .43 73% .31
Feb
1		 Penn St. B A+ A+ F C- 36% 5% 59% A- C+ B- A+ A+ C A+ A A+ D+ B- B C- B+ 45% 22% 33% C+ B F F F C+ A+ F A+
1.18 81% 50% 27% +3 +2 1.11 32% 1.8 .56 19% .33 82% .27 1.21 57% 36% 35% 0 0 1.02 38% 1.7 .63 16% .17 89% .15
Feb
4		 Michigan St. A+ A+ F A+ A+ 33% 20% 47% B- A+ F A D+ A+ A+ C A+ C+ C+ A- C A- 34% 26% 40% B- A- C+ D+ C- D B B+ B+
1.21 73% 0% 48% +7 0 1.16 10% 1.0 .10 10% .54 71% .39 1.16 59% 31% 35% -1 -1 0.98 39% 1.2 .45 14% .32 71% .22
Feb
8		 Maryland B- F A+ A B 24% 2% 73% B+ B+ B- C B- C C+ F D+ F F F A+ F 22% 27% 51% A+ D- C+ B- B- C+ D C+ D+
1.13 40% 100% 40% +4 +1 1.12 30% 1.0 .30 16% .31 57% .17 1.22 78% 73% 24% +6 -2 1.10 34% 1.0 .34 18% .38 71% .27
Feb
14		 Washington C- A+ A+ F B- 26% 17% 57% B+ B- D+ A- C F C D+ C B- F F A F 34% 39% 27% A F A- F F A+ C+ A+ A
0.95 82% 57% 21% -2 0 0.98 23% 1.1 .26 22% .26 67% .17 1.15 79% 69% 27% +16 -3 1.29 30% 1.8 .55 22% .28 54% .15
Feb
17		 Oregon C+ A+ D+ C B+ 19% 23% 57% D+ B A- F D F D B+ D+ A+ D- A A+ A+ 47% 14% 39% D A+ A+ C- A+ B+ A+ F A+
1.02 78% 36% 33% +3 -2 1.04 37% 0.5 .20 22% .21 80% .17 0.74 65% 29% 5% -15 +1 0.76 19% 1.2 .23 20% .04 100% .04
Feb
21		 Rutgers A+ A- D+ A+ A+ 39% 7% 54% A A+ F+ A+ C+ C+ F D+ F B- C C- D+ D+ 32% 34% 34% B- C- A+ C- A+ D A+ C- A+
1.37 67% 33% 56% +21 +2 1.48 24% 1.4 .33 17% .14 71% .10 1.04 56% 41% 35% +1 -2 1.00 19% 1.2 .22 12% .16 75% .12
Feb
24		 Michigan A A+ F B- A+ 28% 11% 61% A+ A+ F A+ F A+ F A+ F B+ D- C F+ D+ 29% 10% 61% A C- B- D C A+ A+ F A+
1.04 80% 17% 33% +3 0 1.09 3% 3.0 .10 12% .11 83% .09 1.19 71% 40% 40% +10 +1 1.22 37% 1.5 .56 22% .10 100% .10
Feb
28		 UCLA A+ C A+ A+ A+ 40% 17% 44% B A+ F A+ F A+ F A+ F+ F+ B- F D- D+ 28% 32% 40% B+ C- D+ B C D A+ F A+
1.40 58% 75% 52% +18 +1 1.40 9% 1.5 .14 5% .17 89% .15 1.31 57% 56% 40% +9 -2 1.16 36% 1.1 .39 11% .12 83% .10
Mar
4		 Indiana F F B+ F F 40% 20% 40% B+ F+ D- F F D+ D- F F C- F+ B+ D- D 44% 10% 46% C- D C- F F B A+ A+ A+
0.77 39% 44% 22% -13 0 0.76 21% 0.6 .13 18% .24 67% .16 1.26 73% 40% 39% +10 +2 1.26 30% 1.9 .57 16% .16 63% .10



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Big Ten Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 10.4 61.9 72.3 11th
12th 19.9 19.9 12th
13th 7.8 7.8 13th
14th 14th
15th 15th
16th 16th
17th 17th
18th 18th
Total 38.1 61.9 Total



Big Ten Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12 61.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 11.6 0.0 0.0 61.9 0.1%
7-13 38.1% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0 0.0 38.1
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 11.5 99.9 0.1%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 0.3% 8.0% 11.5 4.0 4.0
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 1.5% 2.0% 11.7 0.7 1.3
Lose Out 21.3%