Toledo
Mid-American
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
Predictive Rating -0.4 165
Expected Predictive Rating -1.7 197
Pace 70.2 135
Improvement -0.7 215

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense C+ #112 B- C- B- C D+
Defense C- #258 D C- B- B+ D

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 101 57% 200 +1.4 125
2 Pt. Jumpers 27% 63 46% 21 +4.7 15
Three Pointers 31% 348 37% 46 -3.4 296
1st FG Attempt 1.07 95 +2.7 95
Second Chance 28.7% 233 0.99 240 0.28 244
Turnovers 15.8% 112
Freethrows 0.29 241 76% 59 0.22 186
Total Offense +2.3 112

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 105 61% 270 -3.1 285
2 Pt. Jumpers 16% 314 40% 269 +1.3 91
Three Pointers 42% 129 37% 308 -2.6 297
1st FG Attempt 1.10 314 -4.3 314
Second Chance 35.0% 326 0.94 68 0.33 234
Turnovers 18.5% 91
Freethrows 0.24 23 72% 140 0.17 28
Total Defense -2.7 258

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Shot Type Selection -0.6 271 +0.8 315
Shot Type Accuracy +3.3 74 +3.4 308
Possession Length 16.7 112 17.4 206
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.22 63 0.22 322
Improvement -1.2 #260 +0.5 #153

See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 5% 6% 5%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 14.4 14.1 14.7
.500 or above 49% 74% 33%
.500 or above in Conference 94% 99% 91%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round5% 6% 5%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Next Game: Bowling Green (Away) - 38.1% chance of victory

Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Projected Record by Quad
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b0 - 20 - 3
Quad 21 - 31 - 6
Quad 33 - 74 - 13
Quad 411 - 215 - 16


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 191 South Alabama L 74 - 76 67% -9  0% 0 - 1 D+ -7 B- +5 A+ D- C F -12 F F A-
 Sat, Nov 8 164 Marshall L 73 - 85 61% +1  64% 0 - 2 F+ -15 D -6 C D- D- F+ -9 F A B+
 Tue, Nov 11 150 @Wright St. W 81 - 71 35% +4  62% 1 - 2 B+ +14 A- +10 B+ A+ F B- +4 F C- A+
 Sat, Nov 15 271 Detroit Mercy W 90 - 83 80% +4  92% 2 - 2 C- -2 C +2 A- D+ F D+ -4 D C C-
 Wed, Nov 19 205 Youngstown St. W 92 - 75 70% +8  86% 3 - 2 B+ +11 B+ +8 A- C- B- C+ +2 D- D- A+
 Mon, Nov 24 135 Troy W 75 - 68 42% +2  54% 4 - 2 B +9 C +1 C- C+ B- B+ +8 B+ A C+
 Wed, Nov 26 78 Belmont L 72 - 87 23% -3  18% 4 - 3 D+ -8 D+ -4 C+ D+ B- D+ -4 F F A+
 Sat, Dec 6 143 @Oakland L 97 - 98 33% +1  57% 4 - 4 C+ +3 A- +10 B A- C D -7 D- D- F
 Sat, Dec 13 204 @Robert Morris L 70 - 75 47% +6  67% 4 - 5 C- -5 D -5 F D- A+ C +0 C- A F
 Tue, Dec 16 10 @Michigan St. L 69 - 92 3% -20  0% 4 - 6 C -0 B- +5 C C- A+ D+ -5 F+ C- B+
 Tue, Dec 30 295 Western Michigan W 84 - 79 83% -3  34% 5 - 6 1 - 0 D+ -6 C- -1 F+ B C- D+ -4 C C- B+
 Sat, Jan 3 296 @Central Michigan W 78 - 75 66% -5  23% 6 - 6 2 - 0 C- -2 C- -1 F+ F A+ C -1 D B F
 Tue, Jan 6 314 @Northern Illinois W 75 - 61 71% +11  94% 7 - 6 3 - 0 B- +8 C- -2 B- F C- A- +10 D+ C+ A+
 Fri, Jan 9 87 Miami (OH) L 73 - 87 36% -17  0% 7 - 7 3 - 1 D -11 D+ -3 D+ D- B D- -8 F+ D+ D+
 Tue, Jan 13 199 Ohio W 101 - 85 69% +4  51% 8 - 7 4 - 1 B +10 A+ +22 A+ A+ A- F -12 D- F C-
 Fri, Jan 16 147 @Kent St. L 84 - 87 34% +0  43% 8 - 8 4 - 2 C +1 B +7 C+ A- C+ D -6 F+ C F
 Tue, Jan 20 183 @Massachusetts L 82 - 84 42% -2  20% 8 - 9 4 - 3 C -0 B +6 B+ D+ F+ D -7 F D C+
 Sat, Jan 24 158 Bowling Green W 73 - 72 61% -1  31% 9 - 9 5 - 3 C- -2 C +1 D- B A+ C- -3 F A+ A+
 Tue, Jan 27 72 @Akron L 81 - 91 15% -0  34% 9 - 10 5 - 4 C +1 B+ +9 A+ D+ D- D- -8 C- F C+
 Sat, Jan 31 310 Ball St. W 73 - 55 86% +12  92% 10 - 10 6 - 4 B- +6 D+ -4 C F C- A +11 B+ A A-
 Tue, Feb 3 147 Kent St. L 72 - 75 57% +6  91% 10 - 11 6 - 5 D+ -5 D+ -4 C D- C+ C- -2 A- D C-
 Sat, Feb 7 222 @James Madison L 71 - 73 49% -2  27% 10 - 12 C- -2 C- -2 B- D B- C -0 D C B
 Wed, Feb 11 295 @Western Michigan W 90 - 79 66% +5  79% 11 - 12 7 - 5 B- +6 A +11 A+ F A+ D+ -5 B+ F F
 Sat, Feb 14 158 @Bowling Green L 75 - 78 38%
 Sat, Feb 21 231 Eastern Michigan W 77 - 71 72%
 Tue, Feb 24 314 Northern Illinois W 82 - 70 86%
 Sat, Feb 28 199 @Ohio L 80 - 81 46%
 Tue, Mar 3 87 @Miami (OH) L 78 - 88 18%
 Fri, Mar 6 202 Buffalo W 82 - 77 68%
Totals 14 - 15 10 - 8 +0 C+ +2 B- C- B- C- -3 D C- B-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C+ C- A- B B 42% 27% 31% D+ B- C- C- C- B- C- B C C- D+ D+ D D 42% 16% 42% D D D- B- C- B- B+ C+ B+
1.12 57% 46% 37% +3 -1 1.07 29% 1.0 .28 16% .29 76% .22 1.12 61% 40% 37% +3 +1 1.10 35% 0.9 .33 18% .24 72% .21
Nov
3		 South Alabama B- B F A+ A+ 24% 14% 61% D+ A+ F A D- C D+ B C- F F F D F 55% 12% 33% F F F B F A- A- A+ A+
1.15 67% 14% 47% +10 0 1.22 19% 1.3 .26 17% .17 78% .13 1.18 68% 50% 35% +8 +2 1.22 35% 1.1 .39 17% .24 38% .09
Nov
8		 Marshall D F A+ C+ C 41% 29% 30% C C B- F D- D- C- A C+ F+ F A+ F F 25% 10% 65% F F D A+ A B+ B A- B+
1.03 35% 69% 35% 0 -1 1.00 37% 0.6 .22 20% .33 79% .26 1.20 85% 20% 44% +15 0 1.33 36% 0.7 .24 21% .21 67% .14
Nov
11		 Wright St. A- A D+ A+ A 44% 36% 20% F+ B+ A+ B+ A+ F B+ B- B+ B- F C+ D- F 36% 26% 38% B+ F B- F C- A+ C F D-
1.22 70% 38% 44% +8 -1 1.16 46% 1.2 .54 23% .37 74% .27 1.07 80% 36% 38% +9 -1 1.19 29% 1.3 .38 29% .32 87% .27
Nov
15		 Detroit Mercy C A A+ D A 40% 17% 43% C- A- C+ F+ D+ F A+ D+ A D+ C D+ C C- 43% 21% 36% F D D+ B- C C- C+ A+ B
1.18 71% 67% 30% +8 +1 1.19 33% 0.9 .30 18% .48 70% .34 1.09 56% 42% 33% 0 0 1.02 35% 0.9 .30 16% .26 65% .17
Nov
19		 Youngstown St. B+ A+ F A+ A- 56% 19% 26% B+ A- B- F+ C- B- B+ A+ A+ C+ B- B F D- 38% 6% 56% D- D- D+ F+ D- A+ B- B B
1.23 77% 10% 43% +9 +2 1.22 36% 0.8 .29 17% .42 85% .36 1.01 56% 33% 41% +5 +2 1.15 32% 1.2 .39 30% .23 67% .15
Nov
24		 Troy C C- C+ C+ C+ 36% 36% 28% F+ C- C+ C+ C+ B- C A- B- B+ C- F A+ A 48% 7% 45% D- B+ C- A+ A C+ B+ D- B-
1.09 56% 44% 36% +2 -2 1.02 32% 1.1 .35 16% .29 76% .22 0.99 57% 75% 19% -8 +2 0.91 35% 0.6 .23 17% .25 79% .19
Nov
26		 Belmont D+ B B- D C+ 33% 15% 53% B- C+ F A+ D+ B- D F+ D- D+ D+ F F F 36% 4% 60% D+ F F F F A+ A+ C+ A+
1.01 61% 38% 31% -1 0 1.00 17% 1.7 .29 17% .22 69% .15 1.22 67% 50% 50% +18 +2 1.42 40% 1.6 .64 28% .06 67% .04
Dec
6		 Oakland A- C- A+ F B+ 46% 25% 29% C+ B A C A- C D+ A- C D D+ F B+ C- 67% 6% 27% F D- A+ F D- F A- B+ A
1.24 59% 88% 22% +8 0 1.17 45% 0.9 .42 15% .21 79% .17 1.26 60% 50% 29% +1 +4 1.11 21% 2.0 .41 6% .27 70% .19
Dec
13		 Robert Morris D F F B- F 43% 35% 22% F F D- D+ D- A+ A A+ A+ C F+ C+ A- C- 42% 23% 35% C- C- C- A+ A F F B F
1.02 45% 22% 36% -10 -2 0.78 24% 0.9 .21 10% .49 87% .42 1.09 65% 36% 29% 0 0 1.02 36% 0.7 .26 13% .47 64% .30
Dec
16		 Michigan St. B- F A B C+ 27% 31% 42% D C D B+ C- A+ C B C+ D+ C A+ F D- 48% 15% 37% F F+ F A- C- B+ B- C+ B-
0.96 25% 44% 36% -6 -2 0.86 14% 0.8 .12 6% .25 76% .19 1.29 62% 25% 50% +9 +1 1.22 50% 0.9 .47 21% .34 74% .25
Dec
30		 Western Michigan C- A+ A+ F F+ 37% 22% 41% D F+ A+ F+ B C- A+ D A+ D+ A- C- D- C 36% 27% 38% B- C F A+ C- B+ B- C B-
1.17 78% 55% 10% -4 0 0.94 43% 1.0 .43 14% .58 67% .39 1.10 45% 40% 38% -2 -1 0.96 45% 0.7 .33 21% .25 71% .18
Jan
3		 Central Michigan C- F+ B- B- D+ 37% 41% 22% F F+ C F F A+ A+ A+ A+ C C B+ F D 38% 27% 35% C D A+ F B F A D- B+
1.12 50% 40% 36% -1 -3 0.94 35% 0.8 .27 10% .51 81% .41 1.07 57% 33% 42% +3 -1 1.05 13% 2.0 .25 13% .20 75% .15
Jan
6		 Northern Illinois C- D- A+ A+ B- 58% 19% 23% B- B- F+ F F C- C- F D A- C+ A+ C C- 38% 2% 60% D- D+ D+ B C+ A+ A+ B A+
1.05 53% 60% 42% +4 +2 1.13 24% 0.5 .12 18% .33 63% .21 0.86 53% 0% 33% -3 +2 1.00 34% 0.8 .26 30% .22 64% .14
Jan
9		 Miami (OH) D+ F D+ A+ C 28% 41% 31% F D+ C F D- B B+ A+ A D- F+ F F+ F 39% 13% 48% D+ F+ D C D+ D+ A+ F A+
1.05 47% 36% 47% +2 -3 1.00 30% 0.6 .18 16% .34 85% .29 1.25 73% 57% 41% +13 +1 1.30 28% 1.1 .31 14% .13 88% .12
Jan
13		 Ohio A+ B A+ A+ A+ 40% 30% 30% D- A+ A+ A+ A+ A- D A+ B- F C+ F D- F 31% 33% 37% A D- F F F C- C A B-
1.44 62% 75% 44% +17 -1 1.34 46% 1.4 .63 13% .28 94% .26 1.21 56% 59% 37% +8 -2 1.13 36% 1.2 .44 16% .32 63% .20
Jan
16		 Kent St. B D F+ A+ C 53% 13% 35% A- C+ C- A+ A- C+ A+ D+ A+ D F+ D C F+ 45% 11% 45% F F+ F+ A- C F F B- F
1.17 52% 29% 42% 0 +2 1.05 29% 1.4 .41 15% .48 69% .33 1.21 67% 40% 33% +4 +2 1.13 41% 0.9 .38 13% .57 72% .41
Jan
20		 Massachusetts B B- A A+ A 36% 34% 30% F B+ C- C- D+ F+ A- A A+ D D B F F 45% 12% 43% F F F A- D C+ D- C- D
1.16 65% 50% 43% +11 -2 1.19 26% 1.0 .26 21% .45 80% .36 1.19 64% 33% 43% +8 +2 1.20 43% 1.0 .43 20% .39 68% .26
Jan
24		 Bowling Green C F C+ C+ D- 39% 22% 39% D+ D- C A B A+ F A+ D- C- C- F F F 67% 8% 25% F F F A+ A+ A+ A- A- A
1.08 39% 38% 35% -7 0 0.88 28% 1.3 .36 12% .20 92% .18 1.06 59% 75% 46% +8 +4 1.25 36% 0.2 .07 24% .23 67% .15
Jan
27		 Akron B+ C+ F A+ A+ 52% 10% 38% A A+ F+ A- D+ D- D- B D+ D- C C D C 52% 9% 39% F C- F B+ F C+ C+ D+ C
1.16 59% 0% 55% +9 +2 1.25 26% 1.1 .30 21% .24 77% .18 1.30 61% 40% 38% +4 +2 1.15 49% 1.2 .57 17% .24 79% .19
Jan
31		 Ball St. D+ B+ B C- C+ 33% 24% 43% D+ C F C- F C- D+ A- C A A C- A+ A- 43% 18% 39% D B+ D+ A+ A A- F C F
1.08 69% 42% 33% +4 -1 1.08 21% 1.0 .21 19% .26 86% .22 0.81 42% 38% 24% -13 +1 0.77 28% 0.4 .10 21% .50 70% .35
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
3		 Kent St. D+ D+ A+ D C 49% 21% 30% C+ C C+ F D- C+ D- A D+ C- A+ B C A- 31% 24% 44% B+ A- F C+ D C- C B C+
1.06 54% 55% 31% 0 +1 1.04 32% 0.7 .22 15% .26 80% .21 1.10 41% 31% 33% -7 -1 0.85 42% 1.1 .44 18% .37 71% .27
Feb
7		 James Madison C- B- A+ D B 38% 31% 31% F+ B- F A+ D B- F F+ F C F C+ B- D 38% 13% 49% D+ D F A C B D+ F F
1.07 60% 50% 31% +3 -1 1.06 18% 1.3 .24 11% .25 67% .17 1.10 71% 33% 32% +3 +1 1.09 36% 0.8 .30 20% .32 88% .28
Feb
11		 Western Michigan A C+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 15% 36% B- A+ F A+ F A+ A+ F B+ D+ A+ C- B- B 28% 31% 41% A B+ C- F F F C F D
1.31 62% 75% 47% +15 +1 1.34 14% 1.5 .21 7% .44 61% .27 1.15 40% 41% 32% -5 -2 0.87 32% 1.6 .50 12% .28 82% .23



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Mid-American Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 0.0 0.0 0.0 2nd
3rd 0.2 2.6 4.3 1.2 8.2 3rd
4th 1.1 16.1 24.3 8.2 0.7 50.4 4th
5th 0.1 6.1 13.8 2.1 22.1 5th
6th 0.0 1.1 8.6 2.4 0.0 12.1 6th
7th 0.1 3.0 2.0 0.0 5.2 7th
8th 0.4 1.3 0.0 1.7 8th
9th 0.2 0.0 0.2 9th
10th 0.0 0.0 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 0.7 5.4 17.9 32.6 29.0 12.5 1.9 Total



Mid-American Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 0.0%
12-6 0.0%
11-7 0.0%
10-8 0.0%
9-9 0.0%
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 1.9% 11.1% 11.1% 12.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.7
12-6 12.5% 6.6% 6.6% 13.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 11.7
11-7 29.0% 6.4% 6.4% 14.3 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.0 27.1
10-8 32.6% 5.2% 5.2% 14.8 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.1 30.9
9-9 17.9% 2.9% 2.9% 15.5 0.3 0.3 17.4
8-10 5.4% 1.5% 1.5% 16.0 0.1 5.4
7-11 0.7% 2.8% 2.8% 16.0 0.0 0.7
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 5.2% 5.2% 0.0% 14.4 94.8 0.0%


Optimistic / Pessimistic Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 0.2% 100.0% 12.6 42.9 52.4 4.8
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 0.4%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 0.6%
Lose Out 0.7%